How do creationists explain stars?

Hi all I'm new here. The Creation vs. Evolution topic is one of my favorites. I am a Creationist. I will admit I didn't read the whole 12 pages of this topic but I am going to answer the original answer with the only answer that fits the evidence we have today. God made the stars about 6000 years ago and they are all slowly dying. We have not observed one star being formed ever. In fact the process described in science text books contradicts itself. In order for stars to form the gases would have to swirl rapidly to form a gravitational force. This has been observed. What has not been observed is the formation turning into a star. This is because the swirling motion creates heat energy and this energy creates an outward force that overpowers the gravitational force way before a star has time to form.

---

Matt G.

Thanks for the greeting. That Eagles Nest isnt all its cracked up to be. http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i2/stars.asp Check it out the evidence is not there.

---

Matt G.

*Chuckles* Of cource you dont see a tree grow but the evidence is there. I planted a tree 3 years ago in my back yard. When planted it was 6 inches tall. Now it is about 7 feet tall. My point is we have not seen stars form. There are no new stars as far as we can tell. In fact all we see are dying stars. All stars are running out of fuel and energy.

Where is this evidence you claim to have? This an interesting article on this topic. http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i2/stars.aspAs I said there is no evidence for the formation or growth of stars.

NASA has still not observed the formation of stars. That link BTW was mostly about formation of planets. The laws of physics deny the possibility of stars forming.

The law that states that when to forces collide the stronger on wins. The heat energy from the swirling motion causes outward force which quickly overpowers the gravitational force.