I recently discovered a secret book which describes in significant detail, the true formation of the world we live on.
Around 6000 years ago, a large obese, five headed, green eyed, flatulent creature sneezed. Out of each of his ten nostrils emerged the components of the present day solar system. Out of one particular nostril, an accretion which housed many different weird and wonderful life forms was excreted. However, due to the toxic nature of the snotulous liquid which enveloped the world, they all died and were buried, forever preserved in so called rocks. Once congealed, and condensed the world had land and sea. Then an intelligent creature materialised, called man. Man went on to rule the planet Earth.
Now, in all seriousness, whilst no creationist can prove the physical existence of a God, I can use the very same arguments they use to disprove science and support my theory; especially as I too can not prove the existence of the Great Bogie.
My question is therefore this, it is completely obvious that I have made the above up off the top of my head, so how does a creationist prove me wrong without proving themselves wrong?
™ Version 4.2