I guess the reason you don;t want to discuss the evidence is that you know that you will lose and that your evidence will be refuted.
And I'm not surprised when I saw the first page of the site. It's for Carl Baugh's "Creation Evidences Museum" and the Paluxy tracks. Even Answers in Genesis don;t think that Baugh or his evidence are reliable.
Arguments to Avoid Topic
| Answers in Genesis
"Many of Carl Baugh’s creation ‘evidences’. Sorry to say, AiG thinks that he’s well meaning but that he unfortunately uses a lot of material that is not sound scientifically. So we advise against relying on any ‘evidence’ he provides, unless supported by creationist organisations with reputations for Biblical and scientific rigour."
"‘Paluxy tracks prove that humans and dinosaurs co-existed.’ Some prominent creationist promoters of these tracks have long since withdrawn their support. Some of the allegedly human tracks may be artefacts of erosion of dinosaur tracks obscuring the claw marks. There is a need for properly documented research on the tracks before we would use them to argue the coexistence of humans and dinosaurs."
™ Version 4.2
