You realize, I hope, that what you are presenting is creation "science" rather than real science.
You also are preaching, rather than presenting scientific evidence. Scientists don't write as you do, with constant references to unsubstantiated myths and mythical beings as if they were real and had been documented. All you need to do is add "Amen" and your sermons will be complete.
In fact, creation "science" is the exact opposite of real science, as it starts with a conclusion (which not surprisingly mirrors the bible, scripture, and divine revelation) and then seeks to "prove" that conclusion through all manner of distortions, misrepresentations, fabrications, obfuscation, beliefs presented as fact, outright delusions, appeal to authority, and the rest of the methods used by creation "science." Creation "scientists"
have to use those methods, as science and the scientific method contradicts creation "science" at just about every turn.
Another point on which creation "science" is the opposite of real science, and this can be seen in this thread: creation "scientists" are not able to change their beliefs based on new or contradictory scientific evidence because those beliefs weren't based on scientific evidence in the first place. They are religious beliefs, which will be held in spite of any and all scientific evidence to the contrary.
But thanks for playing.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.