However, as you're playing Devil's advocate, the O.P. says convincing evidence.
Convincing to whom? That's my point.
History shows no matter how convoluted or inconsistent a belief may be, one will not let physical evidence or facts get in the way of accepting the belief.
There's no evidence, convincing or otherwise, for the existence of an entity who created parasites to plague us because of something our ancestors did. The creationist side on this thread has yet to present a scrap of evidence for the creation or the creator.
Playing the Devils' Advocate again:
I accept Divine Revelation as truth, just as you scientists accept the Scientific Method. If evidence appears at face value to contradict this revelation then it needs to be reconsidered. Such supposed evidence obviously must be innacurately interpreted.
So my best evidence for Creationism is Divine Revelation itself
Edited by Grizz, : No reason given.