I am going to say that the evidence that kinds exist in the mammal lineage is found in Gould's Contention that SPANDRELS (AS HE, SJG, SAW first in a CHURCH architecture space) ARE the sentence in Jefferys below IF the limited number implicit (Ill discuss if I have this correctly interpreted) logically cuts the baramin discontinuity OR if the defintion of baramins remains empirical (hybrids etc) and I am correct about DETAILS of downward causation via macrothermodynamics. In the latter case the information has to do with say if electrotonics CONSTRAIN what is independent in such a way as to explain Gould's perceptual field as a missensed constraint mathematics but in the former issues the clear possiblity that heirarchical thermodynamics will not forever support any kind of baramin disscussion. But without knowledge of independence I CAN NOT SPEAK in the mammal lineage about the logics that the following sentneces would historicize on the groud that this if/then were comprehended by another mind. That is trice now, why I can not participate in this thread even though I KNOW somethings about it. This can not be the reason that I could/was (be) kicked out of school because if I went to the same Church as Gould I would have seen the same space/place.
By H.Jeffreys "Methods of Mathematical Physics 1950 Cambridge (my favorite so far in this book is Mittag-Leffler's however)
"These are
Langrange's equations. They are usually obtained in text-books on dynamics by direct transformation of (2); but the derivation from Hamiltions' principle explains also why the left side has the characteristic form of the calculus of variations.
Now it may happen that in the actual motion certain relations between the
xsubri, and therefore between the
qsubs, are specified. The most important case is where many particles belong to the same rigid body, and the coordinates can vary only in such ways that distances between particles of the same body remain unaltered. Another is when some coordinate is constrained by external force to vary in some prescibed way with time, as when a part of the system is made to moeve with given linear or angular velocity. Such constraints do not prevent us from considering variations
dqs such that the constraints are violated, and we can therefore still treat all the
dqs as independent and equate their respective coefficients. Then (15) remain true. But their physical interpretation is altered. Whereas in a system of free particles they are differential equations ... the time may appear explicitly in the kinetic energy. This does not affect the form of (15), but it will affect the first integrals."
I will be giving an updated tutorial on geological and experimental time sorting in macrothermodyanmics soon, but now I am two removes away. I want to provide Tony his just due.
I will have argued that GOULD mistissued "Then (15) remain true." with is vision of the muralization of the church. I have not explained how Lewontin went along with it however. The simplistic "MODIFIED" descent remains unlatered howreadever. I dont. E.Scott misthought this. Gladyshev did not. I have gotten fatter. QED