Beretta
Member (Idle past 5628 days) Posts: 422 From: South Africa Joined: 10-29-2007
|
|
Message 1 of 2 (431294)
10-30-2007 10:54 AM
|
|
|
Evolutionists and creationists/ID proponents come to different conclusions from the same evidence according to their world view and starting presuppositions.Which one does the evidence better support? Which evidence do you feel absolutely negates the possibility of special creation and has to point to evolution as the most valid option? Isn't it just the starting point of "I don't believe in the possibility of a transcendent creator" that then leaves evolution as the most plausible option.Neither can be experimentally proven -it is an historical concept that is not provable by either side.Nonetheless the evidence must support one option better than the other.One of them must be true -they can't both be.
|