Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2

Every measurement has a margin of error. If we measure 31.6 degrees multiple times in multiple ways, we can say that it's a fact that the tempeature is between 20 and 40 degrees.Science is very broad with many different fields. In each field, researchers can have their own defintions. And definitions will often not even stay the same forever.You talk like there is one single definition being used in all if science, in all of the past and unchanging in future.

That is all you can ever say, others are wrong and not you. Why don't you prove it? Because you can't! You are full of nonsense!

Thanks for your reply, I agree here.

Because you are in no position to question anybody's education, as you yourself has shown nothing but inferior intelligence.

Your view that there can never be 100% certainty, is more subjective, philosophic perspective than factual.If we measure the temperature of flowing water to be 37.1 degrees, how much percentage of certainty do you give it to be that the water, at least most of it, is in liquid form?

I don't give shit about your assumptions. You have no facts. That is your problem.

But we do know some things with certainty. If you roll a single regular dice and it lands with one of the six sides, you can be 100% certain, that the side up has at least one dot.Yes, it's 100%. Not 99.99999999%. It's nothing less than 100%.

I gave you a clear example as proof. But you have no response to that. Only repeating your rant. Shows how you are only able to repeat what you have been taught, and you accept it no matter how wrong it is.

You should read carefully. If the dice lands on one side, as I clearly stated, that does not include a situation where it lands on a corner or on an edge.Heisenbergs uncertainty principle is more about precision than it is about certainty. It applies to any two physical observables do not commute.

This is literally from what Percy quoted me:"If you roll a single regular dice and it lands with one of the six sides ..."... and it lands on one of its six sides .. is what I meant. This rules out any corner landing..And now you are just angry and annoyed that I understand much more about quantum mechanics than you do.

You can lookup definitions yourself. It clearly did not help you in countering my example in any way.As that seems to be all that you can do. Run away and not directly responding, but instead pretending to be smart by referring to definitions and theory, without being able to use any of it to counter my example.

Wow, the uncertainty of the dice landing on a side. Really?Well then, why don't you say it's uncertain that we threw the dice as well?Or lets say it's uncertain that we measured the tempature at all, in your example.And you dare to speak about ignorance, while all three of you have nothing but bs responses.

The reality is that you are the idiot who has nothing to add at all.

You lack even basic reading comprehension, as I could already predict from a mile away that you low intellects would start about dice landing not on any side. But even including specifics about the landing, you manage to totally miss it. Even after being pointed out, you even dared to call bs. You are only proving your own incompetence.

It was in response to Percy, who commented about measuring a temperature of 37.1 degrees. Is that not an observation then? Why don't you start bitching on him?Your own side makes these statements, but when I'm responding with similar example, I'm the one getting lectured about the whole philosophy of science.You are all just a hopeless bunch.