Why we should not expect many if any Creationists

Before you get out of hand again I'm going to step in as Admin. The behavior you exhibited before your most recent exit was unacceptable and will not be tolerated. All that protected you from suspension was that I was a participant in the threads where the unacceptable behavior was occurring. When you extended your misbehavior to the The Story in the Rocks - Southwestern U.S. thread I issued a Moderator Warning, after which you disappeared. I will not permit you to reappear to continue the same misbehaviors, in any thread whether I'm a participant or not. This is the last warning you will receive.Please, no replies to this message.

Evidence must be the foundation for deciding whether a belief is myth or reality. People are permitted to state their position on such matters without being deemed disrespectful. That brings discussion on this issue to a close.Please, no replies to this message.Edited by Admin, : Grammar.

I've been enjoying participation in discussion in this thread, but recent posts have increased my concern level, so since I haven't posted in a couple days I am announcing that I am shifting to my moderator role in this thread.I have these requests:

1. Please stay on topic. Creationism is not the topic. The topic is why we should no longer expect much creationist participation here.
   ​
2. Each participant should post no more than a single reply to any message. I understand that occasionally a second reply can be necessary, maybe even sometimes another, but the six replies to Message 98 (five of them within a 70 minutes period) are far too many.

I hope to return to normal participation in this thread soon.Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Change "message 99" reference to "message 98".

Topic proposals should be made in the Proposed New Topics forum. Your earlier proposal didn't suggest a specific topic, just indicated a willingness to argue the creationist position.Please, no replies to this message.