The correct answer here is to be more aggressive with parents in collecting the debt and not to embarrass the kids while wasting the food. What interest does that serve?
We all know the correct moral answer to this. The question is why are the schools in this position in the first place? I don't think this is the only case where a food worker's job is on the line for serving an unpaid-for lunch to a hungry child. It shouldn't be up to these workers. There's a bigger problem going on here.
ABE: this is a problem all over the country as I understand it. Each school handles it differently. Im sure lots of kids get the second-rate sandwich solution when they can't pay for the hot lunch, and lots of workers are tempted to give them the hot lunch anyway. Maybe some do and get away with it. Somebody probably just decided to make an issue of this one for Christmas. And probably lunches do get thrown out when they can't be paid for too. Focusing on this single case misses the big picture.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.