You're missing the point. (Deliberately as usual I would imagine.)
He's
twisting the point, into something that he can actually make an argument against
Your actual point stands:
RAZD's wild speculations that the correlation between aboriginal and puritanical nudity standards and levels of sexual abuse has a causal relationship has not been established.
Coyote's joke? assumed the point required that the nudity standard comes from what the society was built on, which is what you then challenged and Ringo responded to.
We await RAZD's support for his claims.
I'd like to look at some of that Victorian porn he mentioned we could.