Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Oh No, The New Awesome Primary Thread
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 587 of 1639 (777892)
02-11-2016 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 585 by RAZD
02-11-2016 12:53 PM


Re: then superdelegates came and started rigging the system
RAZD writes:
Seems the media is ... inadequate...
But the point remains that Hillary is benefitting from establishment superdels.
Democratic superdelegates. I concur.
As a supposed beacon of "democracy" and "free elections" to the rest of the world, the US is, in actuality, a banana republic joke.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 585 by RAZD, posted 02-11-2016 12:53 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 611 of 1639 (778150)
02-17-2016 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 601 by Theodoric
02-17-2016 2:05 PM


rinnnng, . . . rinnnng, . . . rinnng, . . .
Theodoric writes:
Hillary Clinton also has issues that certain people think makes her unelectable.
My ears are ringing.
Theodoric writes:
if Clinton wins the nomination, I will be ready to support her with my time, energy and money.
I suppose at that time, you will give my last post "Message 76 (776853)" in the thread "Presidential Candidates" a reply? (Seems a lot of my non-supporters in that thread scampered silently away.)
By the way, you can add another point to my list: it appears when Hillary was Secretary of State, she sought and received advice from another war criminal, . . . Henry Kissinger. The youngsters don't know that name, . . . but I know you do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 601 by Theodoric, posted 02-17-2016 2:05 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 616 by Theodoric, posted 02-17-2016 4:18 PM dronestar has replied
 Message 718 by RAZD, posted 02-19-2016 8:17 AM dronestar has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 620 of 1639 (778161)
02-17-2016 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 616 by Theodoric
02-17-2016 4:18 PM


Re: rinnnng, . . . rinnnng, . . . rinnng, . . .
Theo writes:
What is the saying "cut of your nose ....?
"cut of your NOSE ....?" Gee, I am uncertain about the last part.
Maybe this Saudi woman from catastrophic human-rights-violating-nation whom Hillary enthusiastically accepts "contributions" can assist you. She seems to be 'distracted' at the moment, but I think the beginning goes something like . . . "cut off your HEAD . . ."
I guess this photo is kinda funny because she is a dark-skinned foreigner. Afterall, amerikan voters don't consider them to be people, . . . right Theo?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 616 by Theodoric, posted 02-17-2016 4:18 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 660 by Theodoric, posted 02-18-2016 9:15 AM dronestar has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 678 of 1639 (778256)
02-18-2016 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 660 by Theodoric
02-18-2016 9:15 AM


Hillary, the sociopathic choice.
Wow Theo. Where do I even begin? Your on-going posts praising Hillary, how disappointing, on many levels.
Theo writes:
Meant Cut off.
Cut off your nose to spite your face.
Yeah, I know the quote. I used your incomplete quote to segue into my response.
Theo writes:
So if Hillary Clinton is the Dem nominee, will you protest her candidacy?
I protest ALL war criminals/mass murderers. For which forum participants throw crap at me for my temerity and indignation, and not at the actual war criminals/mass murderers.
Theo writes:
Will you support the Republican candidate?
Although no Republican candidate is a war criminal like Hillary, nor has any candidate murdered a million innocent Iraqi civilians like Hillary, the absolutely ONLY thing I liked on the republican side was Rand Paul advising for a smallER amerikan defense department/budget, fewer world-wide amerikan bases.
Otherwise, all the rest are hopeful horrific social and foreign policies. So no, I shan't support a republican.
Theo writes:
Will you take your ball and go home?
A puerile phrase. But yes, I do have the right not to vote. Or I can easily vote for a third party like the Green Party whose ethics actually match mine. A radical thought, eh?
This way I can sleep at night, knowing that my actions did not cause harm to other people in this world. However, I guess sleeping must be easy for some sociopathic voters whose support for war criminals/human-rights-violating dictators cause loud screams across the world: "My baby was just murdered by an amerikan drone attack!" Or "Sister, help me!, this phosphorus weapon made in the USA is burning down to my bone!" Or "Doctor, did my deformed baby, conceived among amerikan depleted uranium weaponry, suffer much before she died!!!?" Or "My god!, the amerikan planes just bombed the hospital, again!" Or "Please, PLEASE!, I don't want to be waterboarded again!"
Yeah, I choose not to play with THAT game ball. But I can imagine how much fun the game is for sociopaths.
Theo writes:
Righteous indignation is well and good, but unless you can actually do something to effect the change it is no different than masturbation.
You're right. Indignation alone, withOUT facts/evidence, is not constructive against a willfully marble-headed individual. As a matter of fact, Indignation, even WITH facts/evidence, is not constructive against a willfully marble-headed individual.
I posted a huge list of facts and evidence in the thread "Presidential Candidates." Then, you and everybody else, promptly ran away. So it greatly appears that my evidence that supports Hillary being a war-criminal and mass-murderer is incontestable. Check.
Theo writes:
Yes, your inflammatory comments, photos and videos show how outraged you are. In a sense it is no different than the faux outrage we see from the right.
*Chuckle*
Except for the crucial difference, . . . I provided apparently incontestable facts/evidence. Funny how you missed this part. (Kinda important difference Theo.)
Theo writes:
You rail about these injustices but do not see that we need to get the ship to turn in order to make the changes.
From many posts, I made it absolutely clear, that Hillary and former REPUBLICAN Bush Jr., former REPUBLICAN Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, and all REPUBLICAN presidents since WWII are captaining the exact SAME ship. By voting for the EXACT same mindset that brought us the illegal and immoral Iraqi war, how will that get the ship to turn?
Not a rhetoric question. Be specific.
Theo writes:
Hillary Clinton is not a great choice, but she is a good choice. She can be the instrument of a lot of good change for the people of the United States and people around the world.
*Blinks*
Wow Theo, this is just shocking and willfully ignorant drivel. Especially from you, you're one of the more knowledgeable people on the forum. Please check your medication dosage.
Is there any actual evidence of this instrument of goodness? Or just childish talking points?
I gave a boatload, HMS Queen Mary class, of evidence, showing Hillary is a war criminal/ mass murderer. Now your turn. As Secretary of State for FOUR years, what good did Hillary accomplish for the people around the world?
Be specific.
To help get you started, I'll start you off with examples from these nations:
1. Iraq. Only a few other Democrats were criminal and sociopathic enough to ENTHUSIASTICALLY support Bush Jr in his illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq. A million innocent deaths? (The secular regime overthrown by [Hillary supported] U.S. forces was replaced by Islamist fundamentalists, and the ensuing sectarian civil war has produced horrific cases of sexual violence including not least the enslavement of women by extremist groups like the Islamic State.) Zcomm » On Hillary Clinton, Sexism, and U.S. Foreign Policy
2. Lebanon (Clinton also backed Israel’s massive 2006 assault on Lebanon, as well as the 2009 and 2014 wars on the Gaza Strip, which killed many hundreds of female non-combatants.) Zcomm » On Hillary Clinton, Sexism, and U.S. Foreign Policy
3. Honduras ({Hillary} supported the coup in Honduras, which resulted in a dramatic upsurge in violence against women, with prominent female peasant leaders, union organizers, and indigenous rights advocates among the victims) Zcomm » On Hillary Clinton, Sexism, and U.S. Foreign Policy
4. Saudi Arabia (She’s called for closer strategic ties with Saudi Arabia, the most misogynist government on the planet.) Zcomm » On Hillary Clinton, Sexism, and U.S. Foreign Policy I ask again, while Hillary takes bribes/donations from Saudi Arabia for military weaponry, how many woman have been falsely executed by beheading?
5. Bahrain. (She supported Bahrain’s brutal crackdown on its pro-democracy movement, including prominent women leaders.) Zcomm » On Hillary Clinton, Sexism, and U.S. Foreign Policy
6. Yeman. (Yemeni human rights activist Tawakkol Karman, who was awarded the 2011 Nobel Peace Prize for her leadership in the country’s pro-democracy movement, has spoken out against then-Secretary Clinton’s lack of support in the struggle against the U.S.-backed autocratic regime of Ali Abdullah Saleh) Zcomm » On Hillary Clinton, Sexism, and U.S. Foreign Policy
7. Morocco. (A particularly egregious case of Hillary Clinton’s selective support for the rights of women is her strong support for the autocratic monarchy in Morocco. For example, in 2012 during the height of a local campaign to repeal an article of the Moroccan penal code that absolves a male rapist if he consents to marry his victim Clinton praised the Moroccan government for having protected and expanded women’s rights. Just weeks after Clinton commended the regime, Amina Filali a 16-year old Moroccan girl who’d been raped at the age of 15 and forced to marry her rapist, who subsequently battered and abused her burned herself to death.) Zcomm » On Hillary Clinton, Sexism, and U.S. Foreign Policy
8. Afghanistan. Yeah, life for EVERYbody in Afghanistan improved dramatically under Secretary of State Clinton.
9. Libya. Supported the defeat of Gadaffi, chaos and spreading terrorism ruled afterwards
10. Syria. Supports the defeat of Bashar al-Assad, with the likely result of chaos and spreading terrorism ruled afterwards (See Libya above)
11. Gaza/Palestine. Hillary actually defended Israel murdering the peace flotilla from Turkey.
12. United States military personal with ultra high suicide rates and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
quote:
Hillary's support for the Iraq war, her support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and numerous Arab dictators, her poor record on human rights, and her indifference to international humanitarian law . . . Zcomm » On Hillary Clinton, Sexism, and U.S. Foreign Policy
. . . Seems to contrast with your ill-advised words . . .
Theo writes:
Hillary Clinton is not a great choice, but she is a good choice. She can be the instrument of a lot of good change for the people of the United States and people around the world.
Edited by dronestar, : Paul Rand > Rand Paul

This message is a reply to:
 Message 660 by Theodoric, posted 02-18-2016 9:15 AM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 682 by Theodoric, posted 02-18-2016 5:13 PM dronestar has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 731 of 1639 (778330)
02-19-2016 10:21 AM
Reply to: Message 682 by Theodoric
02-18-2016 5:13 PM


Re: Hillary, the sociopathic choice.
Drone writes:
is not constructive against a willfully marble-headed individual.
Theo writes:
Once the personal attacks start I stop reading.
Good day, Sir.
Wow.
1. "Marble-headed" is a pretty mild ad-hominem attack. For some, it's nearly a term of endearment. Heck, compared to the crap I sometimes get on this forum, I might even consider being called "marble-headed" a compliment.
2. I didn't actually, specifically, call YOU "marble-headed." (I suspect guilty conscience is at work here.) I made two statements:
Drone writes:
Indignation alone, withOUT facts/evidence, is not constructive against a willfully marble-headed individual. As a matter of fact, Indignation, even WITH facts/evidence, is not constructive against a willfully marble-headed individual.
3. And lastly, . . . Really Theo? I'm showing evidence of MASS-MURDER, a MILLION innocent Iraqi civilian deaths, gross human right violations, sexual violence precipitated and supported by Hillary's actions. Amazingly, all these horrific crimes don't upset you the least, as you are more than happy to spend your time and money supporting Hillary. But what sets off your suddenly ultra-sensitive indignation is the term: "marble-headed."
Really?
4. Theo writes:
Theo writes:
Will you take your ball and go home?
This is exactly how forum participants will view your post. Instead of debating, you feigned an upset tummy, then ran away.
I'm disappointed. Not a typical Theo post.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 682 by Theodoric, posted 02-18-2016 5:13 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 732 by Theodoric, posted 02-19-2016 10:23 AM dronestar has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 733 of 1639 (778332)
02-19-2016 10:39 AM
Reply to: Message 718 by RAZD
02-19-2016 8:17 AM


Re: rinnnng, . . . rinnnng, . . . rinnng, . . .
RAZD writes:
posting tips
If you type Message 76 it will link to Message 76 of this thread.
Message 76
If you type Message 76 it will link to Message 76 of the "Presidential Candidates" thread ...
Message 76
... which can also be linked by Presidential Candidates Presidential Candidates
Thanks RAZD. I knew about the message codes, but was too lazy to look them up. I did not know about the thread code. That would have been useful. Cool, thanks for learn'n me.
RAZD writes:
I am not interested in a pissing match to see who can dump on Hillary the most.
That's not why we started our debate. You wrote that you would be HAPPY to have Hillary win the primary:
RAZD writes:
Personally I would be happy with any one of the three {democratic candidates]
That's a far difference to what you are currently writing.
RAZD writes:
So you can call Message 76 a win if you like.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 718 by RAZD, posted 02-19-2016 8:17 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 747 by RAZD, posted 02-19-2016 1:41 PM dronestar has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 949 of 1639 (778632)
02-22-2016 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 747 by RAZD
02-19-2016 1:41 PM


Re: Tomorrow ... tommorow
RAZD writes:
I can see a Hillary\O'Malley ticket having some merit.
I'm guessing there's at least a million dead Iraqis who don't share your optimism in a Hillary\O'Malley ticket.
I guess it is easy to wholly disregard Iraqi viewpoints because they are dark-skinned 'foreigners' whom apparently have no value. It seems to me this is exactly the type of criminal apathy which led to the ease of invading another country, ultimately precipitating the creation of ISIL, and then re-voting for the exact same mindsets.
However, as a hopeful reminder, here is EXACTLY what a Hillary victory looks like to the Iraqis (multiply by about 100,000):
Basing an ethical decision on, CONFIRMED ACTIONS of a war criminal/mass murderer (Hillary) and any of the UNEVIDENCED WORDS that Republican blowhard candidates use during a temporary competition to spout the most outrageous pus to attract the most hateful of voters, seems to be a fool's errand.
Under these conditions, choosing the lesser of evil guarantees, in the end, that the winner is surely evil.
To repeat, I believe ALL war criminals/mass murderers should be tried under international law, and definitely not be elected to office.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 747 by RAZD, posted 02-19-2016 1:41 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 950 of 1639 (778633)
02-22-2016 4:24 PM
Reply to: Message 682 by Theodoric
02-18-2016 5:13 PM


Re: Hillary, the sociopathic choice.
Theo writes:
Once the personal attacks start I stop reading.
__________________________________________________
Theo writes:
What is it with you religious right wackaloons and the desire for martyrdom?
Theo writes:
Again Cat Sci shows that right wing arguments are not based on truth or reality. A hint of racism but no truth.
hypocrisy
n. pl. hypocrisies
1. The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 682 by Theodoric, posted 02-18-2016 5:13 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 951 by Theodoric, posted 02-22-2016 5:16 PM dronestar has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 987 of 1639 (778707)
02-23-2016 3:20 PM
Reply to: Message 951 by Theodoric
02-22-2016 5:16 PM


Re: Hillary, the sociopathic choice.
Theo writes:
Do you have anything better to do than troll?
Yes, . . . to participate in this forum's thread. Perhaps you would like to join me . . .
Theo writes:
Hillary Clinton is not a great choice, but she is a good choice. She can be the instrument of a lot of good change for the people of the United States and people around the world.
We are encouraged to support our positions on this forum via evidence. So, while Hillary was Secretary of State, was there any actual evidence of her being an instrument of goodness?
I repeatedly gave apparently incontestable evidence showing Hillary is a war criminal/ mass murderer. Now your turn. As Secretary of State for FOUR years, what good did Hillary accomplish for the people around the world?
Be specific.
To help get you started, I'll start you off with examples from these nations:
1. Iraq. Only a few other Democrats were criminal and sociopathic enough to ENTHUSIASTICALLY support Bush Jr in his illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq. A million innocent Iraqi deaths. 4500 american military deaths. Creation of ISIL. (The secular regime overthrown by [Hillary supported] U.S. forces was replaced by Islamist fundamentalists, and the ensuing sectarian civil war has produced horrific cases of sexual violence including not least the enslavement of women by extremist groups like the Islamic State.) Zcomm » Page not found
2. Lebanon (Clinton also backed Israel’s massive 2006 assault on Lebanon, as well as the 2009 and 2014 wars on the Gaza Strip, which killed many hundreds of female non-combatants.) Zcomm » Page not found
3. Honduras ({Hillary} supported the coup in Honduras, which resulted in a dramatic upsurge in violence against women, with prominent female peasant leaders, union organizers, and indigenous rights advocates among the victims) Your access to this site has been limited
4. Saudi Arabia (She’s called for closer strategic ties with Saudi Arabia, the most misogynist government on the planet.) Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner I ask again, while Hillary takes bribes/donations from Saudi Arabia for military weaponry, how many woman have been falsely executed by beheading?
5. Bahrain. (She supported Bahrain’s brutal crackdown on its pro-democracy movement, including prominent women leaders.) Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
6. Yeman. (Yemeni human rights activist Tawakkol Karman, who was awarded the 2011 Nobel Peace Prize for her leadership in the country’s pro-democracy movement, has spoken out against then-Secretary Clinton’s lack of support in the struggle against the U.S.-backed autocratic regime of Ali Abdullah Saleh) Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
7. Morocco. (A particularly egregious case of Hillary Clinton’s selective support for the rights of women is her strong support for the autocratic monarchy in Morocco. For example, in 2012 during the height of a local campaign to repeal an article of the Moroccan penal code that absolves a male rapist if he consents to marry his victim Clinton praised the Moroccan government for having protected and expanded women’s rights. Just weeks after Clinton commended the regime, Amina Filali a 16-year old Moroccan girl who’d been raped at the age of 15 and forced to marry her rapist, who subsequently battered and abused her burned herself to death.) Your access to this site has been limited by the site owner
8. Afghanistan. Yeah, life for EVERYbody in Afghanistan improved dramatically under Secretary of State Clinton.
9. Libya. Supported the defeat of Gadaffi, chaos and spreading terrorism ruled afterwards.
10. Syria. Supports the defeat of Bashar al-Assad, with the likely result of chaos and spreading terrorism ruled afterwards (See Libya above)
11. Israel/Gaza/Palestine. Hillary actually defended Israel murdering the peace flotilla from Turkey.
12. Egypt. Supported/defended dictator Mubarek until he was on the verge of being deposed.
13. United States military personal with ultra high suicide rates and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Your turn Theo.
Be specific.
_____________________________________________________
Two war criminals embrace . . .
Edited by dronestar, : Added: Two war criminals embrace

This message is a reply to:
 Message 951 by Theodoric, posted 02-22-2016 5:16 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 990 of 1639 (778713)
02-23-2016 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 958 by anglagard
02-22-2016 7:44 PM


Re: Nobody to vote for
Hi Anglagard,
anglagard writes:
I have seen a lot of deserved and severe criticism from Dronester about Hilary never seeing a war she doesn't like . . .
Thanks Anglagard.
anglagard writes:
. . . but none of Sanders for never seeing a war he does like -- did I miss something?
Hmmm, I LOVE Sander's domestic policies, but I think you are not aware of Bernie's hawkish side.
I believe Rand Paul and Jill Stein (Green Party http://www.jill2016.com/) are the only candidates supporting to vastly shrink the american military and its hegemony ways.
anglagard writes:
I can't see voting for Clinton either but not because she is a socialist -- how could someone that indebted to Wall Street be considered a socialist?
Same thing about Obama and his ties to Wall Street. I believe the rest of the world correctly sees Obama and Hillary as rightwing republicans. But for the corporate media's constant spin, we have people like Faith believng they are socialists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 958 by anglagard, posted 02-22-2016 7:44 PM anglagard has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 993 of 1639 (778716)
02-23-2016 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 952 by Faith
02-22-2016 5:33 PM


Re: Nobody to vote for
Faith writes:
Good for Dronestar, the only one here facing down the Democrats.
Thanks Faith, but there's irony of you patting my back, I am putting down war-criminal Hillary for her ENTHUSIASTIC support of a criminal republican initiative which left a million dead innocent Iraqis and the spread of ISIL.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 952 by Faith, posted 02-22-2016 5:33 PM Faith has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


(1)
Message 1487 of 1639 (785366)
06-03-2016 10:14 AM
Reply to: Message 1486 by RAZD
06-02-2016 5:17 PM


Re: Coming into the final turn ...
Hey RAZD,
It's been several months since your last post, I was starting to get the DTs without my daily dose of RAZD.
The negative ratings of Hillary and Trump are through the roof, as they should be. I had hoped Bernie would respond to the Green Party's invitation to join them. I would like a Stein/Sanders ticket.
I would join you in Spain. Of all the countries I visited, none have the appetite for love, food, and life like the Spanish. Ever been to one of their festivals? I'd recommend The Fallas in Valencia.
Valencia Las Fallas Festival | Fallas Events & Fireworks | St Joseph Festival

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1486 by RAZD, posted 06-02-2016 5:17 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1488 by RAZD, posted 06-05-2016 9:30 AM dronestar has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 1495 of 1639 (785769)
06-10-2016 10:45 AM
Reply to: Message 1494 by RAZD
06-10-2016 1:15 AM


Champions of 1%ers are the presumptive nominees
RAZD writes:
If you truly want to beat Trump above all else, then Bernie Sanders is the rational choice for candidate.
Well, I am in agreement with most of your words, good job RAZD. But I would like you to consider that while the DNC would prefer Hillary over Trump, they would still rather have Trump over Bernie.
The Democrats may not be quite as bad as the Rebublicans, however, keep in mind Democrat policies ARE pro-corporatism/fascism and pro-military/hegemonic. "Portly-pantsuit-Hillary' IS a war-criminal and corporate-Wall-Street-whore who will CONTINUE to champion the rich 1%ers over the common 99%%ers. However, I believe Trump would still erratically champion for the rich, and Bernie would hurt the 1%ers.
Thus, the DNC do NOT want Bernie.
At this point, I am praying for one of two possible Hail Mary passes.
1. Clinton's email crime causes her to be indicted. What she has done was worse than heroic whistle-blower Chelsea/Bradley Manning who was convicted.
2. Bernie joins Jill Stein and the Green Party. The Independents vote them in. There is much rejoicing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1494 by RAZD, posted 06-10-2016 1:15 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1500 by RAZD, posted 06-15-2016 7:40 AM dronestar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024