Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   EM space drive
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 51 (735015)
08-04-2014 2:18 PM


Whether real or not, maybe someone could even explain the significance of this.
I understand the importance of getting power without having to tote around an exhaustible fuel supply, but I don't really understand just how much power the research in these articles is reporting.
What's 720 mN of thrust? How about 30-50 micro-Newtons?
Could this have applications on the ground?

Love your enemies!

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by ramoss, posted 08-04-2014 5:46 PM Jon has replied
 Message 37 by Taz, posted 08-11-2014 12:08 PM Jon has replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 51 (735026)
08-04-2014 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by ramoss
08-04-2014 5:46 PM


So it's enough to move 2 oz. worth of material? Is that what I should be taking from that?

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by ramoss, posted 08-04-2014 5:46 PM ramoss has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Dogmafood, posted 08-05-2014 8:23 AM Jon has not replied
 Message 13 by Stile, posted 08-06-2014 11:59 AM Jon has not replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 51 (735242)
08-07-2014 8:00 PM


Clarifications
I was really interested in figuring out what kind of acceleration you could get on an average space satellite with the 2 oz. of thrust: a 0 to 60 in so many seconds sort of answer.
As for my comment about the ground, I was anticipating an answer that took into account the friction and gravity that must be overcome to move things; I wasn't too concerned about friction-less surfaces, since those don't exist in the everyday world.

Love your enemies!

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by NoNukes, posted 08-07-2014 9:03 PM Jon has seen this message but not replied
 Message 36 by Taz, posted 08-11-2014 12:02 PM Jon has seen this message but not replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 51 (735386)
08-12-2014 11:44 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Taz
08-11-2014 12:08 PM


I was asking for clarification on a measurement that was unfamiliar to me.
I simply wanted to know what was being said in the reports.
Don't over analyze my question to justify your hyper-philosophizing.

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Taz, posted 08-11-2014 12:08 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Taz, posted 08-13-2014 9:35 AM Jon has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024