Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Proposed Rules for Debates
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


(3)
Message 35 of 44 (722817)
03-25-2014 8:50 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Faith
03-25-2014 7:42 AM


Re: Pressie is two edumacated
Faith writes:
You can say it all you want, but if you are wrong about the exact age, and you must be, you'll never know it, will you?
Faith, you're again using content-free arguments. This rebuttal you're using can be made about anything. You could say the same thing to a heliocentrist and it would make as much sense: "You can say the Earth orbits the sun all you want, but if you are wrong about the that, and you must be, you'll never know it, will you?"
That you're unpersuaded of an old Earth by the evidence simply puts you in the same category as geocentrists and flat-Earthers who are equally unpersuaded by the evidence. That such people as yourself exist has no bearing whatsoever on the facts, which also exist and are all against you.
I would propose this rule of debate: If you have nothing to say, don't say anything.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Faith, posted 03-25-2014 7:42 AM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024