Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   My Beliefs- GDR
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 127 of 1324 (699193)
05-15-2013 5:49 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by New Cat's Eye
05-15-2013 5:31 PM


Re: sentience needed?
A wound healing is the creation of new cells too, right?

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-15-2013 5:31 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 427 of 1324 (701553)
06-20-2013 9:46 PM
Reply to: Message 425 by GDR
06-20-2013 6:47 PM


First and foremost it is evidence for the life, death resurrection of Jesus.
Just as A Song of Ice and Fire is evidence for the life, death(s) and resurrection(s) of Beric Dondarrion via the Lord of Light (the one true god).

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 425 by GDR, posted 06-20-2013 6:47 PM GDR has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(1)
Message 571 of 1324 (701860)
06-27-2013 1:14 AM
Reply to: Message 569 by GDR
06-27-2013 12:54 AM


Re: Starting Circles
The more time that goes by without a confirmed sighting the less plausible its existence becomes.
You deserve some kind of cognitive dissonance award for this post.
:abe:
inb4 you say "what I actually meant was...."
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 569 by GDR, posted 06-27-2013 12:54 AM GDR has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(1)
Message 604 of 1324 (702005)
06-28-2013 7:12 PM
Reply to: Message 602 by GDR
06-28-2013 6:26 PM


Re: Bigfoot
Sure, I don't disagree with that but I understood the discussion was comparing the atheistic vs theistic positions. Maybe I misunderstood.
It is and Stile described the more common atheist perspective. You have been here long enough to know that atheism does not mean "I believe there are no gods" but rather "I don't believe gods exist as they have been put forth". You're smart enough to know the difference.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 602 by GDR, posted 06-28-2013 6:26 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 608 by GDR, posted 06-28-2013 8:14 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 612 of 1324 (702017)
06-28-2013 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 608 by GDR
06-28-2013 8:14 PM


Re: Bigfoot
*gnosticism relates to knowledge.
*theism relates to belief. Belief is a subset of knowledge.
Agnostic Atheist: You don't know whether or not there is a god, but you don't believe there is one. Most atheists take this position as it is the most intellectually honest since only a Sith deals in absolutes.
Agnostic Theist: you don't know if there is a god, but you believe there is one.
Gnostic Atheist: you know there is no god OR you actively believe there to be NO gods.
Gnostic Theist: you know there is a god.
I equate atheism with materialism
Materialism is materialism and atheism is atheism. You should equate atheism with atheism (the non beleif of a deity).
Matt Dillahunty of The Atheist Experience has this explanation down to a science, so check this link out
:abe:
Also a common mistake with a lot of people is to think that agnosticism is a mid point between theism and atheism. It's not. Lastly, you are atheist towards all the other gods that have been presented (Zeus, Thor, Hades etc), I just go one further (credit to Carlin, obviously).
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 608 by GDR, posted 06-28-2013 8:14 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 624 by GDR, posted 06-29-2013 1:13 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 632 of 1324 (702077)
06-30-2013 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 624 by GDR
06-29-2013 1:13 PM


Re: Bigfoot
I'm not sure that those definitions are universally agreed on
You're right, it's not. However, the definitions I've given are about as widely accepted as I think you'll find. Since atheists are as such by way of being freethinkers, you are unlikely to find any two that agree on everything. All it takes to be an atheist is answering no to the question of "do you believe in god". There is no doctrine of atheism, there is no book. There isn't anything binding atheists together. It just so happens that many of "us" do agree on a lot more topics.
So it would do you well to find out what someone believes before assuming what they believe.
That is pretty much how I have always understood the terms. I believed that atheists were as strong in their convictions of a lack of deity as I was convinced in the existence of one.
So as long as you've been here debating this shit with atheists, you never bothered to find out what we actually believe? What would you think if I had some twisted notion on what christians believed? What if I ascribed Faiths beliefs onto yours?
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 624 by GDR, posted 06-29-2013 1:13 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 634 by GDR, posted 06-30-2013 7:53 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(1)
Message 633 of 1324 (702078)
06-30-2013 7:06 PM
Reply to: Message 629 by GDR
06-29-2013 6:37 PM


Re: Fundamental vs Rational... apples and oranges
However, in the end it does take a leap of faith.
It does in the beginning, too. And the middle.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 629 by GDR, posted 06-29-2013 6:37 PM GDR has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 640 of 1324 (702096)
07-01-2013 10:26 AM
Reply to: Message 634 by GDR
06-30-2013 7:53 PM


Re: Bigfoot
I think that if you read back over this thread you'll see that trying to pin down what the atheists on this forum actually believe is like trying to nail jelly to the wall.
You've been a member here for 8 years with over 3,000 posts and you still have the very basics wrong? Doesn't look like you are trying very hard or find out what the other side thinks or believes.
But yes, finding out the beliefs of atheists is a trying task because "atheist" only describes one very minute aspect of "our" beliefs. Most all atheists only reach the atheist conclusion AFTER identifying as skeptics or freethinkers and are skeptics or freethinkers first and atheists only as a result. Skepticism is the worldview, atheism is the conclusion.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 634 by GDR, posted 06-30-2013 7:53 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 642 by GDR, posted 07-01-2013 12:01 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(1)
Message 644 of 1324 (702102)
07-01-2013 12:30 PM
Reply to: Message 641 by GDR
07-01-2013 11:53 AM


Re: Bigfoot
Using your definition of atheist means that God does not exist
Not a single atheist on this site or in this thread has used a definition of atheist that says "there is no god". YOU, on the other hand, have.
I ask again: how would you feel about us if we continued to accuse you of believing the flud actually happened or some other such nonsense even though you've made relatively clear your basic belief set? You'd think particularly low, eh?
therefore the resurrection is a non-starter as there is no god to make it happen.
Each event (the resurrection and the existence of a god) have the same evidence: none, so each event is a non-starter. As soon as you provide evidence for either, "we atheists" will examine those events and determine if they are worthy of belief. As oni stated earlier: we start from Ignosticism and have no position until you provide a claim. When all you've got is hearsay and your sayso, we have no reason to believe or accept and continue on as if you were talking about some other unevidenced phenomena.
It may not matter much, but you used to be one of the more respectable christians here. That respect is slowly dwindling away in my eyes.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 641 by GDR, posted 07-01-2013 11:53 AM GDR has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 648 of 1324 (702114)
07-01-2013 3:37 PM
Reply to: Message 646 by Faith
07-01-2013 1:00 PM


Re: Heretics and Atheists
What on earth is wrong with the definition of not believing in God or gods? Even Tangle said that's what it means.
As has been pointed out to GDR numerous times, that is not the definition he has been using. That is why I and others have had to correct him. There is a marked difference between "I believe there to be no gods" and "I don't believe there to be gods".
Do try to keep up.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 646 by Faith, posted 07-01-2013 1:00 PM Faith has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(1)
Message 649 of 1324 (702116)
07-01-2013 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 647 by GDR
07-01-2013 1:42 PM


This means that everyone is free to take pot shots my beliefs, without having to provide an alternative belief to compare and discuss.
Often times "I don't know" is the best answer one can give. Feeding yourself empty platitudes and false hopes does no good if you only do so in the name of having a belief. Faith and belief are not virtues. Why does there have to be an alternate belief? You only see them as pot shots because they aren't standing up to legitimate scrutiny. You are being given a rather fair shake as far as christians on an internet forum spouting bullshit is concerned. A far more fair shake than I would give you. You just don't realize how good you have it.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 647 by GDR, posted 07-01-2013 1:42 PM GDR has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(1)
Message 653 of 1324 (702126)
07-01-2013 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 652 by Faith
07-01-2013 5:15 PM


Re: Evidence for the resurrection
but I'd assume
That's your problem right there. Perhaps you should read something before calling other people fucking names.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 652 by Faith, posted 07-01-2013 5:15 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 654 by Faith, posted 07-01-2013 5:20 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(1)
Message 655 of 1324 (702128)
07-01-2013 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 654 by Faith
07-01-2013 5:20 PM


Re: Evidence for the resurrection
Message 652
Faith regarding GDR writes:
Perhaps I'm only echoing what GDR said (he gets some things right, as heretics usually do), but it bears repeating even if so.
Message 646
Faith regarding GDR writes:
I think you're a heretic because you are very well acquainted with the claims of Christianity but you believe an extremely distorted version of those claims.
You openly admit not being part of the discussion, yet you have the balls to call GDR a heretic? You're a crazy as loon and you have the balls to call anyone a heretic? You are a witch.
:abe:
You do realize that you didn't even use the word heretic correctly, right? You do realize that YOUR beliefs are contrary to standard christian beliefs, right? Witch.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 654 by Faith, posted 07-01-2013 5:20 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 656 by Faith, posted 07-01-2013 5:47 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(1)
Message 657 of 1324 (702134)
07-01-2013 5:51 PM
Reply to: Message 656 by Faith
07-01-2013 5:47 PM


Re: Evidence for the resurrection
You're a heretic and your beliefs are not at all mainstream. Your beliefs are such a small subset of jesus freaks that they make you looney tunes. 9/10 christians would lump you in with muslims ready to blow up a plane. Your beliefs are the same type that cause abortion centers to get blown up.
yet you have the balls to call GDR a heretic?
name calling isn't nice, is it? Maybe next time you shouldn't use stabbing words unless you are fine with getting cut.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 656 by Faith, posted 07-01-2013 5:47 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 658 by Faith, posted 07-01-2013 5:54 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 832 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(1)
Message 659 of 1324 (702137)
07-01-2013 5:55 PM


Point proven. Thanks. Now we return to our regularly sceduled programming.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

Replies to this message:
 Message 660 by Faith, posted 07-01-2013 6:03 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024