|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Flood Geology: A Thread For Portillo | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3743 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
mindspawn writes:
Would you like some examples of earlier civilizations that have artwork based on extinct skeletal remains? I should have rather referred to recent civilizations not current ones (before the fascination with evolution over the last few hundred years.)"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3743 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
mindspawn writes:
But that is not your argument - that is simply your claim: humans and dinosaurs co-existed. Yes I would, but only from the last 1000 years. Any earlier then you would be making my point for me, that dinosaurs could have recently become extinct. Your argument is that images of dinosaurs proves that dinosaurs and humans co-existed.This is clearly not true, as Dr. A's images show. Your argument has been invalidated.Your claim is unsupported. {abe}And here's a statue from around 1000AD: Edited by Panda, : No reason given."There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3743 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
mindspawn writes:
It was not even 1% conclusive: your point was shown to be invalid.
So yes my point was not 100% conclusive. mindspawn writes:
How reliable is that web-page? Moving on, what about carbon dating dinosaur bones, recent dates were found through carbon dating that contradict the standard view on their ages:I suspect that ScienceVsEvolution.com have an axe to grind. For example: they think that C-14 carbon dating (which only dates items up-to ~50,000 years old) would produce an age other than ~50,000 years.(They also think that Dr. Walter Libby invented radio-carbon dating. *shrug*) There are limitations to each method of measurement. To ignore them is stupid.e.g. Take a grain of salt and measure its width with a ruler or its weight with your bathroom scales. Weighing a car with kitchen scales is stupid.And dating dinosaurs bones using C-14 is just as stupid. "There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3743 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
mindspawn writes:
Yes, they could have found a skeleton. Nice pictures. so you believe those Bolivians found a completely intact dinosaur skeleton and created a statue? Like I said, I guess that's possible that those primitive people could recreate an accurate statue from some bones. Good point!Or they could have just imagined it. People have drawn 'dinosaur-looking' animals throughout history.To arbitrarily claim that images from 2000 years ago are of extant dinosaurs but images from 1000 years ago are of extinct dinosaurs makes no sense, and simply assumes your conclusion - i.e. circular reasoning. Edited by Panda, : No reason given. Edited by Panda, : No reason given. Edited by Panda, : No reason given."There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3743 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
Again - another link filled with lies and misrepresentations.
"Actual red blood cells in fossil bones from a Tyrannosaurus rex?": No.
"With traces of the blood protein hemoglobin (which makes blood red and carries oxygen)?": Nope.
"It sounds preposterousto those who believe that these dinosaur remains are at least 65 million years old.": Not only preposterous, but also untrue. Seriously, stop believing these links without at least checking the original data.(I find it indicative of deceit when that web-site does not have any links to external verification of it's claims.) Edited by Panda, : No reason given."There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3743 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
Coragyps writes:
...who are secretly funded by The Global Stalinist Communist Evolutionist Marxist Brigade of Nazi Baby Killers! Obviously you never could, as the Worldwide Atheistic Geologist Cabal has already decided it must be suppressed....."There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3743 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
Hi mindspawn,
mindspawn writes:
So the lack of a genetic bottleneck in humans is due to the sons of god impregnating humans, yes? I had to go back and read through all your posts to find out why you wrote that. It's because the sons of God descended from heaven to fuck human women, yes? Thus enlarging our gene pool, right? But this doesn't happen any more, apparently. The Bible just stops mentioning them. Did God, so to speak, ground his sons at some point, and say: "OK, no more descending from heaven, you just do it to chase after human ass. I'm taking away the keys of your Heavenmobile"? One has to wonder. yeah it seemed to stop soon after the flood. who knows who the sons of god are, its sometimes translated as angels, some people see them as aliens (other race-groups in the universe). Others have a simple more practical view that a certain group built a more sophisticated civilization (let's call it Atlantis) and these men because of superior technology were known as gods. Just the fact that the bible is open on the topic, and fairly unclear, makes the biblical view on humans non dependent on a bottleneck situation. Did the same sons of god impregnate all the animals which also do not have a genetic bottleneck? (And what did the cheetahs do wrong?) Edited by Panda, : No reason given."There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3743 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
mindspawn writes:
Is that your final answer? hey maybe there were alien bulls too pregnating cows.."There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3743 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined:
|
mindspawn writes:
So - this skink is not a reptile as it gives birth to live young:
On the contrary these dolphin like Ichthyosaurs are warm blooded and have live young, not conforming to biological classification of reptiles at all. But this skink is a reptile as it lays eggs:
Well, I am glad we cleared that up."There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3743 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
mindspawn writes:
Are you retracting your "...have live young, not conforming to biological classification of reptiles at all" statement? Yeah the first one looks a lot like Dr A's monkey. clearly a mammal! If you like, we can move on the the 'warm-blooded' aspect of your claim after this.
mindspawn writes:
I would have preferred it if you had not ducked the issue. Panda if you reading this - its a joke"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024