dronester writes:
The person who believes "So, because Iraq refused to give permission to allow US troops to abuse and kill it's citizens, Obama sent the US troops to Afganistan" is a correct chronological time-line, also believes MY time-line is incorrect. Ok.
And the person that quote mines my replies will misrepresent my position.
dronester writes:
Yeah, so powerful are the Iraqis, even the whim of preventing the illegal and immoral invasion that killed up to one million innocent women and children was thwarted.
So, now you claim the opposite?
If you could just keep your claims even slightly consistent, then maybe you wouldn't look like such a conspiracy nut.
dronster writes:
Panda writes:
Dronester writes:
Obama wanted to keep american forces in Iraq beyond the new year. But the Iraqis wouldn't allow Obama's demand for immunity for american soldiers to carry out atrocities against women and children like the above.
Which would make that just a baseless assertion with only the most trivial of connections to the Afghan atrocity.
I am sure the parents of the murdered children feel the same, trivial, way.
Again, you are clearly reaching for some kind of meaning - but you have pulled up short.
You have somehow mixed up your claim about Iraq with how the victims of a
soldier murderer in Afghanistan feels.
dronester writes:
Yeah, so far in this thread I only evidenced this ONE piece of information.
Correct.
You have not evidenced anything else.
Maybe you could start by showing how Obama bears any responsibility for that crime?
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
Tradition and heritage are all dead people's baggage. Stop carrying it!