|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Does science ask and answer "why" questions? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
Sure, you can say that evolution is just a series of allele changes over time, but does it have the same meaning as the process itself?
What's being said is that the meaning is in your mind. Your mind is an emergent property in your brain. Your brain can be studied as to what neurons are firing and when. We've already got rudimentary "mind-reading" programs using fMRI. Feelings and preferences, while strong, are still just chemical and electrical impulses in your brain. They can be induced externally by people with the necessary neurological training...and by con artists. Knowing that the emotions are just that, doesn't take away the effects they have on us...or at least they don't to me.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
To be extremely reductivist...but if I studied the placement of every drop of pigment that makes up the picture...or every brush stroke that went into it, I could determine the process by which the painting was made. That would make me appreciate it more, and would do nothing to reduce my ability to simply sit back, ignore the technical and enjoy it viscerally.
Likewise, I can know that my emotions are neurological and physiological responses to certain stimuli without reducing the impact they have on me or stopping them from sweeping me away in euphoria or melancholy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
Well I am baffled as to how one can reconcile the fact that changes to ones physical brain can shape ones preferences with the belief that ones preferences are independent of physical brains. Let me preface my response by stating that I am not a dualist...I prefer my own made up term, Quantum Determinist. But, you could say that the brain is the filter for the "soul" or whatever non-physical thing we are beyond our bodies. Then, if you mess with the brain, you mess with the filter, making things seem to be different, when the source, the "soul" is still unchanged. It would be like drawing on or breaking the monitor fo your computer. It can't show you things in certain areas of the screen, but that doesn't change the functions or storage of the computer, just the disply of it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
So if you suffer some brain damage that changes your personality radically you think there is a non-physical "real you" with your original personality floating around somewhere? Do I think so? No. Do Dualists think so? From what I've heard from them, yes they do.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
Viscerally, it feels like my mind isn't physical. And for many, the thought of your consciousness existing eternally is very comforting...but no, I don't think either of those reasons are valid for actually thinking this is actually true.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
I don't know what a non-physical "real me" would possibly be like. I'm not even sure it could recognisably be "me" at all. The whole idea just hasn't been thought through. Especially when you add in temporal considerations. Is the real me when I'm 20? 50? 90? Maybe it's when I'm 5? And wouldn't it be less comforting to think that either your real you degrades as you reach advanced age...or the real you is less and less able to communicate with the real world, essentially stuck in a box until the release of sweet death?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
But I said that it was the ideal that is causeless, not what I think or believe but rather love, honor, faith, GOD that are causeless. Are you arguing for a form of Plato's forms? Where we experience a reflection or copy of love, but that the essence of love exists independent of us?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
Science can help me understand the mechanics of how I make that decision, but it will not explain which one I will actually stick in my pocket and take along. This is not true. Using fMRI and little bit of calibration with the actual individual involved, scientists have indeed been able to determine which object a person is going to choose moments before they are aware of the choice themselves.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
But that still does not explain why I made those choices, only the mechanics of how I made those choices. And if the mechanics are all there is? I know you don't think this is the case, but much like the ID debate...what would a world be like if mechanics was it and how would it be different from the world we are in now?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
It would be far less interesting and pretty much worthless. Why do you say this? How would you recognize the difference?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
I'm not at all sure that I could recognize the difference but the fact that I could get fooled by a counterfeit does not mean it is still not a counterfeit. True, but that just means, all else being equal, you are just as likely to be fooled by the real as the counterfeit. If our universe is such that all there is is mechanists cause and effect, you'd still believe in something higher. So everything you've said and felt are entirely consistent with a universe that is purely mechanistic. In that case, why would you believe in an additional preposition? Occam's Razor would seem to indicate we go with the mechanistic universe, at least until we find evidence of something else.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
Because I do not believe that is all there is and so far science has been singularly useless at explaining to me those whys such as love, beauty, honor, god But why do you not believe that is all there is? I would postulate that science has done as good a job as it can, and will do a better job in the future as technology allows, but that you just reject the answers being offfered. I would even argue that the fact that love, beauty, honor, even god are all subjective experiences would seem to imply there is no grand "form" of love etc that exists independent of us. The love I feel for my wife and family and friends is not the same love felt by others, indeed the love I feel for my wife is different from the love I feel for my family, and different still from the love I feel for my friends. It seems much more likely that a subset of actions and feelings that indidcate familiarity, dependence, desire, and etc get lumped together and labelled love. In fact, quite often the feelings that are labelled love in popular culture I would call infatuation, obsession and many other less flattering names.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined:
|
Science does a great job and I accept the answers but so far they simply explain the mechanisms, the hows. And if that's all there is...as you've admitted, you couldn't tell the difference if there were or not...then what science has answered is all there is to answer.
Theology and Philosophy are tools to ask questions such as purpose or ideals; to help develop ideas of what questions to ask and what paths to follow. My degree is in Philosophy, so I'd be the last to say that Philosophy (or theology) are useless, but they rarely provide answers. What they do is give options or hopes or desires...science is the only thing that gives an answer. At least one that isn't just a shot in the dark.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
If that's all there is, then as I said, the world is a lesser place. I wouldn't say it's "lesser" it just "is." It may have less than you want or desire, but sadly, the world rarely cares what we want. I want enough money to not have to worry about it, I'd like to have a consciousness that continues, and I'd even like the idea of some sort of paradise after death, but until I see the money in my bank account, or actually experience this eternal consciousness or paradise, I'm stuck without any reason to believe any of them are true.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perdition Member (Idle past 3269 days) Posts: 1593 From: Wisconsin Joined: |
And Plato would counterargue that the fact that you can identify love, beauty, honour or god are because you are remembering the ideal forms from a prebirth state of existence. And different people recall things differently, so disagree on some of those things, but they are all referring to the same ideal form. And Plato would be full of shit. As with all terms that describe senses or feelings, all we can do is assume a similar feeling based on similar actions. I have no idea whether the feeling I have termed "love of spouse" is the same as someone else's. All I can see is that it makes me act in a similar way. Now, neurologists can point to certain amounts of neurotransmitters and chemicals in certain areas of the brain, but again, people have differeing amounts but we still call it the same feeling. I still submit that what we call "love" and "honor" etc is merely a categorization of similar actions in different people.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024