buzsaw writes:
Hi Gnojek. There's one problematic little phrase in your post which allows your majority opinion here on this board no more clout than the minority view. Here it is:
could have existed
Cheers!
Hi back, buzsaw!
Ok, I don't see the problem.
Could have existed is the only way to put it.
That's what science tries to figure out with regard to the inaccesible past, what could have been. Unless we have some kind of time machine, that's as good as it gets, the most plausible scenario.
That's what differentiates science from religion.
Science says
maybe,
could have, and even
most likely, while religion says
most definitely based on an equal or lesser amount of evidence.
If you think you are in the minority and would like to be in a majority, there is
another board here that's on your side. It didn't take me long to get banned from this one. If you are in the minority and you let the least bit of sarcasm or condescension in your posts, and you will be banned immediately with no warning. If you are a creationist, you can be as flippant as you want to be.