Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Lack of Defining Features of Intelligent Design
tsig
Member (Idle past 2939 days)
Posts: 738
From: USA
Joined: 04-09-2004


Message 37 of 41 (430939)
10-28-2007 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Elhardt
10-28-2007 8:36 AM


Contradictions in terms
Elhardt:
The term"irreducibly complex" is a contradiction in terms.
Irreducible means:
"r`re`du’ci`ble
a. 1. Incapable of being reduced, or brought into a different state; incapable of restoration to its proper or normal condition; as, an irreducible hernia.
2. (Math.) Incapable of being reduced to a simpler form of expression; as, an irreducible formula.
Irreducible case
(Alg.) a particular case in the solution of a cubic equation, in which the formula commonly employed contains an imaginary quantity, and therefore fails in its application."
While complex means:
"# (n.) Assemblage of related things; collection; complication.
# (n.) Composed of two or more parts; composite; not simple; as, a complex being; a complex idea.
# (n.) Involving many parts; complicated; intricate."
Quite simply a thing that is irreducible cannot be composed of more than one part while a thing that is complex has to be composed of two or more parts.
Given the normal usage of the English language a thing cannot be both irreducible and complex.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Elhardt, posted 10-28-2007 8:36 AM Elhardt has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024