I really have to break cover for this one -
John I been observing the debate, the problem that your opponents have is that they cannot understand how someone who claims to have a strong science and mathamatics background can make such a rudimentary error in regards to the 50/50 probability that you offer as an "answer". Moreover, you don't even seem to be able to comprehend
why this is such a rudimentary error.
Moreover, you don't seem to what to deal with the issues that people are raising in regards to your answer.
Would it be helpful if someone provided a more detailed explaination of
why your conclusions are in error?
Do you understand what I'm getting at?
™ Version 4.2