It seems that you are moving the Design goal posts from product centric to systematic, and if so, then you MIGHT be able to make a case for design. If you want to say that the system itself seems perfectly designed to assure that life continues (mutation and all the other methods of genetic change) despite changes in the environment (natural selection) then I would agree, the system does seem to have worked well over an extended period of time.
But is that really evidence that even the system itself is designed?
Does that not mean that no specific end product is intended but rather only life itself MIGHT be a desired outcome?
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!