Thank you for reopening.
Now, on to these so called "results".
Some general comments:
First of all, I guess we could have seen this coming, some of his questions had absolutely nothing to do with the topic, and of course, he clearly confused evolution with abiogenesis, something more prone to happen in the "creationist" camp.
Secondly, I don't know how he came up with some of his results, there is no way he could've drawn some of these conclusions from the survey.
Now, some comments on the mail he sent:
mignat talking about evolutionists writes:
My findings are that one group consistently:
showed more intolerance, wanted to prejudice children in their favour, said that science uses tests when considering a theory but all failed to mention any tests that found in their favour
You never asked for tests in favour of any worldview, meaning this conclusion is completely bogus.
mignat later writes:
...couldn't see that both sides shared acceptance of microevolution
Both sides
don't share acceptance of micro evolution. there are creationists that deny this.
mignat talking about creationists writes:
The other group agreed with an even-sided teaching in schools,
Why should something that is wrong be taught as fact?
mignat later writes:
showed complete tolerance,
I don't believe you.
mignat later writes:
half of them gave scientific data to support themselves and noticed the contradiction.
I don't believe you again, mainly because there is no scientific data to support creationism. Also, this was supposed to be a study about tcriticism and what both sides thought of that, it had nothing to do with whether or not one worldview was true or not. You suck at surveying.
mignat in conclusion writes:
For the first group to criticse the other of being intolerant, ignorant or unscientific(the most common criticisms) is certainly unjustified and unjustifiable.
No it isn't, and you cold never have drawn that conclusion from your survey, it is again complete bollocks.
mignat then writes:
Sadly, it's that group that does by far the most criticising.
It's the evolutionists.
Congratulations, you came on here presenting yourself as objective, but you clearly weren't. Good show from the creationist side, once again. Are you happy you could fool some people into working with your survey, so you cold come to your preferred conclusion?
Got somewhere where we can see the results in detail, including all the answers given? I'm not holding my breath for this one.
™ Version 4.2