Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Has The Supernatural Hypothesis Failed?
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4220 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 47 of 549 (572782)
08-07-2010 3:46 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Buzsaw
08-07-2010 3:13 PM


Re: Defining terms
So now, listen up, sheeples. Here's how they do the science. Concoct up a mathmatical numbers game, ignore the observable laws of the universe and go with it for the multiple universe thingy. ABAKADABRA-DOO! IT'S SCIENCE!
Maybe so, but at least they use evidence instead of bronze aged myths the the creos use.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Buzsaw, posted 08-07-2010 3:13 PM Buzsaw has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4220 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 132 of 549 (573985)
08-13-2010 12:48 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by archaeologist
08-13-2010 6:18 AM


Re: Has The Supernatural Hypothesis Failed?
no it hasn't, it is just foolishness on the part of the unbeliever to expect to understand the Bible or expect God to answer their demands when they do not believe the Bible or Him.
Many, if not most, of us unbelievers were at one time believers until we saw the real truth, that the Bible, that you push so wholeheartedly,
was written by frail and uniformed men, who tried to explain the phenomena of the earth & universe, but without what was needed to discover what was. That is what was later found or created, the equipment necessary to extract the information.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by archaeologist, posted 08-13-2010 6:18 AM archaeologist has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by Bikerman, posted 08-13-2010 7:57 PM bluescat48 has replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4220 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 134 of 549 (574102)
08-14-2010 12:58 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by Bikerman
08-13-2010 7:57 PM


Re: Has The Supernatural Hypothesis Failed?
The quotes are mine.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Bikerman, posted 08-13-2010 7:57 PM Bikerman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by Bikerman, posted 08-14-2010 4:07 AM bluescat48 has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4220 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 146 of 549 (574528)
08-16-2010 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 141 by Bailey
08-15-2010 9:12 PM


Re: Supernatural Vs natural Explanations
I suggested that once a scientific theory is overturned, it becomes 'science fiction' - as relevant to the scientific culture as anything 'supernatural'.
When a scientific theory is overturned it is completely discarded by science ie: Phlogiston. or it enters the realm of pseudoscience ie: alchemy. It may be used as science fiction by science fiction writers who are either no science oriented or are science oriented but using it as satire or sarcasm ie the following:
Wikipedia writes:
Thiotimoline is a fictitious chemical compound conceived by science fiction author Isaac Asimov and first described in a spoof scientific paper titled "The Endochronic Properties of Resublimated Thiotimoline" in 1948

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Bailey, posted 08-15-2010 9:12 PM Bailey has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Bailey, posted 08-16-2010 3:04 PM bluescat48 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024