Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Genuine Puzzles In Biology?
Nij
Member (Idle past 4919 days)
Posts: 239
From: New Zealand
Joined: 08-20-2010


Message 41 of 153 (584753)
10-03-2010 11:15 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by barbara
10-03-2010 9:36 PM


Re: Perhaps a dumb question
Considering that everything living today is the result of every generation prior lived long enough to reproduce the next that goes back to the Cambrian era, wouldn't the entire DNA sequence be nothing but mutations?
Yeah, basically.
Although it would sometimes be a useful tool to set an arbitrary ancestor as having no mutations for comparison or whatnot.
To go from a small multi-cellular organism with parts and the continuous alteration that has occurred since it all began I would think that everything in our DNA is a mutation
It's most probable that everything in our current genome is a mutation, but only because the chances of any portion of DNA surviving that long without any change at all is so miniscule as to be almost impossible.
Note that this includes mutations which reversed themselves back to the "original".
I would say the same also holds for any other species' genome for the same reason.
Had you shouted bingo as well, you'd have received the prize
But it raises another interesting question: at what point would we find a truly original genome, one that had zero mutations?
Effectively that's similar to asking at what point we would find the UCA, a kind of discussion may be more suited to its own thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by barbara, posted 10-03-2010 9:36 PM barbara has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by barbara, posted 10-03-2010 11:50 PM Nij has replied

Nij
Member (Idle past 4919 days)
Posts: 239
From: New Zealand
Joined: 08-20-2010


Message 43 of 153 (584767)
10-04-2010 1:00 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by barbara
10-03-2010 11:50 PM


Re: Perhaps a dumb question
By that, do you mean "genes" or "alleles"?
I also wouldn't think there's any correlation between the number of possible alleles, or the number of genes involved, and the ability of that species.
Any other numbers to compare with?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by barbara, posted 10-03-2010 11:50 PM barbara has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024