Easy proof for Inteligent Design

In the same way that the non-designed Mandelbrot Set is a just a random mixed up curve in the complex plane?

It is not random at all!!! That is the whole point. It is a perfect example of extreme order and complexity without design.

Really? What disorder? It is mathematics. The Universe itself shows itself to be inherently mathematical. That is not by design. It is the nature of reality. It is the designed universe that would make little sense and appear to be random in nature, unless the designer went out of its way to make such as universe look undesigned.A consistent necessary universe gives rise to an Earth with lifeforms such as tetrapods, but no hexapods such as dragons, pegasi, centaurs and angels. A designed universe has no such restrictions.

No. The exact opposite. If there was a mind, I would expect more disorder. The order I see reveals no choice, no input, and so I can only conclude no design. If you can show me dragons (of the four legs, two wings variety) I will agree that there is a designer.

No, I see no disorder at all. All I see is a reality built of mathematical relationships. There is no room for disorder, for choice, for "designer input". Just as with the Mandlebrot Set. There is huge variety, but it all must be consistent. So there is no room for any god to play with its creation. You may think this "invigorates" the idea of design, and that is fine. But this does not begin to make even evidence, never mind "proof".Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.

This is in no way disorder - quite the opposite. QM is completely deterministic, and the probablistic features precisely follow the associated probability distributions. Furthermore, it is quite possible (and I think probable) that even this probablistic nature is a secondary effect. Given sufficient measuring apparatus and time, it would be possible to eliminate all but the most minor deistic tinkering. Feeling count for nothing - in fact, given past history, feelings tend to work opposite to reality. Nonsense. There is no mechanism known in science that can give rise to true "freewill", and all evidence so far suggests that "freewill" is merely a secondary effect of brain function. Why should such unambiguous reasoning lead anyone to suggest that "everything is illusion" as being a sensible conclusion?

I am not talking about hidden variables. No, the probability distributions are an output of the theory - in no way are they designed. Perhaps you can show me which part of wave-function evolution is not deterministic? Don't be afraid of going technical, I used to teach this stuff Yes, of course. And why? Because I get pleasure from it - robot or not.

Wave-functions don't have a position You are asking the wrong questions - don't expect classical answers when the Universe is quantum. Deny it? It's there all the time. But it is "simply" brain function.

Incorrect and irrelevent - I suggest you study the development of quantum theory before continuing this line of reasoning. Layman knowledge will only tie you in knots, as we are seeing.Look, you are wandering far from your point, which still stands refuted - fundemental phsyics has shown us that reality follows a mathemtical order that leaves no room for design or choice, yet is so vast and hypothetically allows an infinitude of domains with varying physics that just about any plausible outcome will be realised at some point within the global parameter space. We see no room, nor need for any designer. That does not mean that there is no designer. But then it is not us, rather you, that is claiming a "proof". Are you ready to retract your claim? Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.

As I have stated, you really do not know enough about this subject to continue in this vein - the above nonsense is clear evidence of this.