Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scientific Theory For Dummies
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 23 of 57 (555870)
04-15-2010 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by marc9000
04-15-2010 7:40 PM


marc9000 writes:
The denial of the close relationship between today’s science and atheism never ceases to amaze me.
There is no such "close relationship". But if you get you enjoyment in life out of having a persecution complex, then don't let me stop you.
marc9000 writes:
But the opening poster didn’t have anything bad to say about him, did he?
All you can tell from the open post, is that he did not have anything bad to say about Dawkins that was on topic for this thread. So you are just jumping to conclusions not supported by the evidence you are citing.
marc9000 writes:
But when selling atheism to teens and twenty-somethings, top scientists think about it a lot then, don’t they?
Very few top scientists are selling atheism to anybody.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by marc9000, posted 04-15-2010 7:40 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 24 of 57 (555873)
04-15-2010 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by marc9000
04-15-2010 7:55 PM


marc9000 writes:
That’s exactly right — far fewer people know what an allele frequency is than have read at least one of these four NY Times best sellers; Sam Harris's Letter to a Christian Nation , Daniel Dennett's Breaking the Spell, Christopher Hitchens's God Is Not Great , and Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion.
Personally, I have not read any of those books. I expect that I would find them insufferably boring - but that's just a guess based on the titles. I can do without the rhetoric from either side, thank you.
I have been in university computer science and mathematics departments. Over the years, I have had over 100 colleagues. And I only have an inkling about the religious views of two of them, and even then only because of chance remarks. The subject just does not come up.
marc9000 writes:
I have a suggestion, it would be for the scientific community to strongly suggest that its most prominent members (Shermer and Dawkins, Stenger, Dennett, countless others) get OUT of the atheist promotion business! Do you have a better idea than that one?
Personally, I would prefer that they get out of the atheist promotion business. But they do have a freedom of expression, so they will have to make that choice for themselves.
By the way, Dennett is a philosopher, not a scientist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by marc9000, posted 04-15-2010 7:55 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024