Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheist evolutionists: How far will you allow yourselves of sexual perversities?
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 40 of 152 (523231)
09-09-2009 12:54 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by mike the wiz
09-08-2009 2:14 PM


No Contradiction, Logic, or Morality Here
mike the wiz writes:
This is why people think we have "homophobia", if we pick out certain folk, but I should also mention that staright-sex fornication is not permissable under the New Testament and many christians will partake in this.
So your position is that all sex, even when a husband and wife make love, is sinful according to the NT and therefore immoral and wrong. Is it also your position that all sex is perversity? Does your sect promote this teaching?
Also over at the thread starting with Message 1 you were specifically called out by Dr Adequate to condemn rape under all circumstances. To the best of my knowledge you have so far refused to make this simple statement. Yet according to this message you condemn consensual heterosexual sex between a husband and wife as sinful.
So all sex is sin even among the married except under certain circumstances in the OT where your god sanctioned the rape of total strangers.
Thank you for making your position clear.
Edited by anglagard, : move the word out to make the phrase 'called out' as it would be more grammatically correct

The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by mike the wiz, posted 09-08-2009 2:14 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Dr Jack, posted 09-09-2009 7:57 AM anglagard has replied
 Message 45 by mike the wiz, posted 09-09-2009 10:43 AM anglagard has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 49 of 152 (523416)
09-10-2009 4:47 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by Dr Jack
09-09-2009 7:57 AM


Re: No Contradiction, Logic, or Morality Here
Yes, of course you are right and in that post, I was wrong.
Must have been on autopilot or something, time to take a break.

The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Dr Jack, posted 09-09-2009 7:57 AM Dr Jack has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by mike the wiz, posted 09-10-2009 7:05 AM anglagard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024