Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Don't get it (Re: Ape to Man - where did the hair go?)
Gary
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 116 (96235)
03-31-2004 3:07 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by WiseMan
03-30-2004 7:52 PM


Just because we evolved from a common ancestor with apes doesn't mean that long ago, there was a creature who was born with ape-like qualities, who lived a really long time and as he grew older became more and more like a human. It was a gradual process that took many, many generations.
Long ago, there was a population of creatures which were a common ancestor to humans and apes. That population, for some reason, broke up, with one part moving into an environment which made ape-like creatures more likely to survive, while the other group moved into an environment which favored human-like creatures. The ones with the genes which best suited their environment were more likely to live to an age at which they could have children. All the others died before they could reproduce. The ones that reproduced passed on their genes to their children, so eventually, since apes and humans come from different environments, they adapted in different ways.
The main reason we seem to have stopped evolving is because one of the biggest factors in evolution is natural selection. Now that there are over 6 billion people in the world, and little to no competition from other animals, not much natural selection goes on, so our species doesn't change very much.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by WiseMan, posted 03-30-2004 7:52 PM WiseMan has not replied

  
Gary
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 116 (96446)
03-31-2004 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by mike the wiz
03-31-2004 8:02 AM


quote:
I read something about Natural Selection that says if you lose the information then you can't get it back.
I don't think this is true. Walking stick insects have evolved and lost wings several times, though the process took millions of years.
Newsroom - The Source - Washington University in St. Louis
Page Not Found | Cleveland Museum of Natural History

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2004 8:02 AM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by crashfrog, posted 03-31-2004 6:10 PM Gary has not replied
 Message 55 by zephyr, posted 04-27-2004 3:17 PM Gary has replied

  
Gary
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 116 (103173)
04-27-2004 7:31 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by zephyr
04-27-2004 3:17 PM


You are right. I don't believe that evolution has a purpose, its just the way things change with their environment. I disagree with the person quoted in one of those articles who said that it was amazing that walking sticks could evolve wings when they needed them - its not a matter of need, its a matter of natural selection and random mutations.
I think it is okay to have laws named after people. People will still figure out if they need to be changed. For example, everyone knows Lamarkian evolution is flawed, even though it is attached to Lamark.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by zephyr, posted 04-27-2004 3:17 PM zephyr has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024