Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,927 Year: 4,184/9,624 Month: 1,055/974 Week: 14/368 Day: 14/11 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Human - Chimp split 4 million years ago?
Refpunk
Member (Idle past 6083 days)
Posts: 60
Joined: 08-17-2007


Message 18 of 33 (419141)
09-01-2007 10:06 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
02-24-2007 11:17 AM


Did you know that the DNA of mice and chickens is actually closer to the human DNA than apes and chimps? So does that mean that humans are chickens?
Yet that's the reasoning of evolutionists. They are so blind-sighted that they can't see that the reason that the DNA of animals and humans is similar is because in order to survive on this planet, animals and humans have to share these things:
1)A heart
2)A brain
3)A digestive system
4)A stomach
5)Arms and legs
6)A circulatory system
7)A nervous system
8)A reproductive system
9) 2 eyes, 2 ears, a nose and a mouth
10)An endocrine system
Amd many MORE COMMON TRAITS THAN DIFFERENT TRAITS. But evolutionists say; "Duh, why do animals and humans have similar DNA. Dat must mean dat animals turned into humans, uh-huh, uh-huh." LOL
Needless to say, that kind of impossible leap to conclusion only proves that evolutionists not only can't see WHY animals can't turn into humans, but it excludes the real reason why the DNA of anials and humans are so similar. So evolutionists need to get out of their labs and observe what animals and humans breed in reality so they won't jump to erroneous and impossibly bizarre conclusions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 02-24-2007 11:17 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by RAZD, posted 09-01-2007 10:19 AM Refpunk has not replied
 Message 20 by Modulous, posted 09-01-2007 10:34 AM Refpunk has not replied
 Message 21 by crashfrog, posted 09-01-2007 10:36 AM Refpunk has replied

  
Refpunk
Member (Idle past 6083 days)
Posts: 60
Joined: 08-17-2007


Message 22 of 33 (419154)
09-01-2007 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by crashfrog
09-01-2007 10:36 AM


Sorry, but since even CHILDREN know that animals don't turn into humans, then evolutionists don't even know as much as children know!! So as jesus says; "HE who exalts himself will be humbled."
And evolutionists are humbled indeed by making up impossible and ludicrous scenarios that even children can see are false until they ar brainwashed by those less intelligent as they are, simply because adults are stronger and more powerful than they are.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by crashfrog, posted 09-01-2007 10:36 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by AdminNosy, posted 09-01-2007 11:51 AM Refpunk has not replied
 Message 25 by Modulous, posted 09-01-2007 12:02 PM Refpunk has not replied
 Message 27 by RAZD, posted 09-01-2007 12:30 PM Refpunk has replied
 Message 33 by crashfrog, posted 09-01-2007 9:25 PM Refpunk has not replied

  
Refpunk
Member (Idle past 6083 days)
Posts: 60
Joined: 08-17-2007


Message 24 of 33 (419164)
09-01-2007 12:01 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by crashfrog
09-01-2007 10:36 AM


Do you know how many "scientists" in the 19th century devoted their lives to studying how bleeding can cure people??
Do you know how many "scientists" in the 19th century devoted their lives to studying why brain size determines intelligence??
Do you think that just because some people have devoted their lives to prove nonsensical theories, that makes their theories true? History has hown the opposite.
So since one of the msot favorite phrases of scientists is; "We now know that what we once thought ws true is not true", then the ONLY PEOPLE WHO ARE IGNORANT are those who can't think for themslves but believe ANY prevailing theory in any generation no matter how impossible and ludicrous it is.
Edited by Refpunk, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by crashfrog, posted 09-01-2007 10:36 AM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by AdminNosy, posted 09-01-2007 12:04 PM Refpunk has not replied

  
Refpunk
Member (Idle past 6083 days)
Posts: 60
Joined: 08-17-2007


Message 28 of 33 (419192)
09-01-2007 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by RAZD
09-01-2007 12:30 PM


Re: Erroneous thinking repeated again
Sorry but calling a human an animal because it's popular to do so no more makes a human an animal than calling a human a tree makes him a tree.
And these two statements: For years, the genetic similarity between humans and chimpanzees was put at 98.5%. The figure was then revised down to less than 95%.
And: "The similarities between mice and human DNA is 97.5 compared to 95 % between apes and humans."
But I notice that the variations in DNA differs all over the web depending on who you talk to. So since scientists don't know, then obviously, no one can know.
But it's too bad that scientists have to go into labs to try to define humans and animals, nor can they unbderstand why mice can't breed or change into humans. They therefore jump to impossible conclustions that can't happen in reality all because they don't know why humans and animals have similar genes. The theory of evolution is thus, much more bizarre and impossible than any other theory in the 19th century.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by RAZD, posted 09-01-2007 12:30 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by AdminNosy, posted 09-01-2007 1:43 PM Refpunk has not replied
 Message 30 by RAZD, posted 09-01-2007 1:52 PM Refpunk has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024