Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Ape Man: Truth or Fiction?
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 50 of 190 (133111)
08-12-2004 4:37 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by NOTHINGNESS
08-11-2004 9:13 PM


Re: Monkey Steps
1) No. Darwin beleived that many of the gaps reflected the limits of the geological record and would never be filled.
"I look at the natural geological record, as a history of the world imperfectly kept, and written in a changing dialect; of this history we possess the last volume alone, relating only to two or three countries. Of this volume, only here and there a short chapter has been preserved; and of each page, only here and there a few lines"
2) No.
3) The previous stages are not "species" - except possibly "man" and even then you must accept the species Homo erectus and Homo habilis as being something other than man. If what you are asking for is a fine-grained transitional sequence (because you won't see a fossil transform before your eyes !) then we really have only a few examples, all of marine life. However we do hvae the so-called "archaic" Homo sapiens specimens which while being accepted as part of our species fit in between modern humans and Homo Erectus.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by NOTHINGNESS, posted 08-11-2004 9:13 PM NOTHINGNESS has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 129 of 190 (136225)
08-23-2004 4:04 AM
Reply to: Message 126 by NOTHINGNESS
08-23-2004 12:47 AM


Re: Ramapithecus holding hands with modern man.(S)
See Creationist Arguments: Anomalous Fossils
Calaveras was probably a joke.
quote:
Personal testimonies and geological evidence indicate that it is probably a modern Indian found in nearby limestone caves, and that it was planted as a practical joke by miners. Tests have shown it to be
recent, probably less than 1000 years old
The Castenedolo remains were later burials
quote:
An official report on these skeletons in 1899 noted that all the fossils from the deposit were impregnated with salt, except the human ones. This implies that they are from relatively recent burials. Collagen tests in 1965 and radiocarbon dating in 1969 confirmed this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by NOTHINGNESS, posted 08-23-2004 12:47 AM NOTHINGNESS has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024