From chimp to man: it's as easy as 1, 2, 3!

In response to Martin (preview available @“MV.doc on The Trainer’s products)I have begun to unfold an idea about the origin of sex (as latent variables are combined biophysically by algebra across creationist mediated (Noah’s) limits on phenotypic variety geometrically).Kitcher makes the view

quote:

---

“If human beings were a completely separate creation, why did the creative force find it apt to form our species in the chromosomal image of the great apes?”

---

quote:

---

---

On the enumeration I am attempting for MV lies the possibility the quantification of human chromosome 2 is completely beyond the difference of sex of any mammal(I do not want to say crassly that Philip simply misappropriates Gould's use of Lamarck being hired to work on "lower" creatures).It was merely a quick thought for me while reading Kitcher, to recognize that reverse reading frames along DNA could be speculatively responsible for the apt difference he ascribes to the Creator or Designer.I have no idea if this is true but perhaps someone invested with the argument may look it up further. Copy number variation WK brought up may proove instrumental in the discussion with Bernd in another thread. I don't know.Edited by Brad McFall, : spellingEdited by Brad McFall, : sentence