See above. I propose that they get over their squeamishness regarding full banishment.
I happen to agree with you about randman. I believe the contents of his posts are a complete waste of bits. The problem I think though is not that the admins need to get over their squeamishness but that the EvC population needs to stop wanting to pander to crazies. Admins have already shown that they will actually ban people. Faith is gone for example. The issue is that maschocistic people here at EvC keeping demanding them back. I personally think that the board has been better without Faith. I also think it is better without randman, JAD, and Ray in the general forums. The creationists who remain are much better at constructing an argument rather than simply repeating the same thing over and over again.
Every who is banned or restricted has a mantra that they could never look past to actually engage their opponent.
Faith : Your argument is invalid because you are operating with evo assumptions. The rules declare my position to be invalid but my position IS valid because I am not claiming scientific accuracy. (round and round)
randman: Haeckel! Haeckel! Packitus! Haeckel! Fraud! QM! (repeat)
Ray: Your lack of godsense = inability to refute.
JAD: *begin post* (insert rabid insults) *end post*
I am of the opinion that they just need to be banned. NJ I think is an example of a "good" creationists, someone who will actually somewhat respond to what is being talked about rather than some meta-martyr or broken record type discourse that the above mentioned are famous for.
Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)