StormWolfx2x
Inactive Member
|
I have to back dan up on this, initaly the problem stemed from Ianart making some arguements that were full of logical fallacies and very pro Islamic, what ensued was that a lot of people that were on some level offened by his claims quickly and openly refuted him pointing out what was wrong with his proposals refuting both his proposals and their pro Islamic veiws. Contra saw this as us ganging up on him and those Islamic veiws and belived us to be Muslim bashing in general, when in fact we were theorachy bashing trying to use examples against a Islamic Theocracy which doesn't come up much around. The back and forth between contra and dan followed. but Dan did not use personal attacks at all, only respones to another person's personal attacks.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 77 by Dan Carroll, posted 04-14-2005 10:59 AM | | Dan Carroll has not replied |
|