I mean, to re-use the example I said. I don't take it as dishonest when someone refers to creationists as fundamentalist, even though it makes them seem as Al-Quaida bombers lol.
you are obviously very young and very naive... now there's a surprise
Long before anyone had heard of Al-Quaida, we (as born-again evangelical Christians) referred to OURSELVES as fundamentalists - in fact, we coined the phrase "informed fundamentalists" as we thought we were being smart! Fundamentalist theology and liberal theology were the two extremes in Christian circles. This was the early 80's. Calling a Biblical creationist a fundamentalist is no more insulting than calling him a Christian. Using "evolutionist" to refer to any non-creationist scientist is idiocy at best, and in Humphrey's case (as a "scientist") reveals just how much he has screwed up his own head. Given his bumbling ignorance in his creationist "cosmology", I wouldn't trust him to tie his own showlaces...
™ Version 4.2
