Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Buz's seashell claim
IrishRockhound
Member (Idle past 4467 days)
Posts: 569
From: Ireland
Joined: 05-19-2003


Message 19 of 23 (43108)
06-17-2003 7:50 AM


Here's the geological deal - in uplift and plate tectonics, bits of the sea floor can be caught between the two plates and end up on top of mountains. The fact that Mt. Everest is made of marine limestone is perfectly logical - the Himalayas were formed by the collision of India with the Eurasian plate. Before this, there was a shallow sea in between them where limestone could easily form.
If this is true then there should be evidence in the Himalayas of severe deformation. Anyone know if this is the case?
The Rock Hound

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by PaulK, posted 06-17-2003 10:09 AM IrishRockhound has not replied
 Message 21 by Percy, posted 06-17-2003 10:41 AM IrishRockhound has replied

  
IrishRockhound
Member (Idle past 4467 days)
Posts: 569
From: Ireland
Joined: 05-19-2003


Message 22 of 23 (43440)
06-19-2003 4:49 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Percy
06-17-2003 10:41 AM


And there you have it. The Himalayas are still moving today.
I wonder - how does this fit in with Genesis?
The Rock Hound
------------------
"Science constantly poses questions, where religion can only shout about answers."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Percy, posted 06-17-2003 10:41 AM Percy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024