New helium retention work suggests young earth and accelerated decay

I am beginning to concieve what CONSEQUENCES can come OUT of the RATE project. Now, avoiding legitamate language discussions, TB<, (that must occurr before the following speculation can be actively engaged in the back variable/coefficient etc for *any* parameterization of the problem...) it will be a consideration in response to Newton's OPTICKS queries (Maxwell corpus if not corpse of a jellyfish in the offning) of "Coloumb barrier"( [Disintegration of Uranium by Neutrons. by Meitner L. and Frish O.Or. collected by Leicester SOURCE BOOK IN CHEMISTRY Harvard 1900-150]), baraminoloigcal contribution to biodiversity informatics WITHOUT support for accelerated drug discovery, Coulumb's law vs any/ever statistical mechancial development "in this way, remembering that Coulomb's law puts the forces inversely, proportional to the square of the distance, a closer correspondence is brought forward between the exponent 2 in this law and the exponenet 1/2 of the concentration in the activity law" [Debye in Leicester abovep191-2], Wolfram's notion of Fundamental Physics, Interionic Attraction THEORY, 2nd calculation OTher than Helmholtzs'?; in this list physico-chemically for any biochange that may in the alternative be metrically not counterindicated either for any psychology in answer to the inductor theory of e-fish.I am celebrating no mere inclusion.

No, I was thinking of asking for it for Christmas. Last Year I got the Defender's Study Bible. Also, in Wolfram's A NEW KIND OF SCIENCE, there really has only been one series of pics that caught my eye which may not be irrelevant to the RATE stuff (about lattice growth of crystals). I guess they might have a two-pronged theory of fluid dynamics on two scales but my foucs and interest has been biology not stright physics however I am now starting to look in gels(associated with death processes in plants) for universality that it may not be long before my interest in this electronically which came from some thoughts in biodiversity informatics may meet the molecular models of the RATE crew. This was rather unexpected even for me but by focusing on computation rather than energy the whole c/e thing as science becomes acutally addressible without turning a large part of both sides off etc.

There is nothing "incomprehensible" if the numerologies to predict graphs in science need have a differnt ordering and differnt "constant" IN A MODEL.It seems that depending on the relative understanding of a given laymen we JUDGE the use of these as used to be the discussion of what 99% 95% etc counted as statistical significance, so it would be needed to get every one on the same equation before we are all on the same page.I only wish I WAS using eqauations and coeficients and not words but if I evetually start with MATHEMATICA even that could happen. So in the case of this model of radioelements maybe I, BSM need to restrict my dissucion in this thread to e-volts only. DONT know, but TB is getting this all on his own. YOu can drop the Brad reference.