Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Board Administration ⇒ Suggestions and Questions ⇒

Faith's Participation in EvC

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Faith's Participation in EvC
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4141 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 31 of 285 (354277)
10-04-2006 8:29 PM 		Reply to: Message 1 by NosyNed
10-04-2006 2:05 AM

No don't ban faith, i may get annoyed with the things she says, but she holds to her guns and i salute her
​
might as well close the forums if we ban creationists out of frustration
though i would have to say faith trying to argue in the science forums is a bit.. slippery
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by NosyNed, posted 10-04-2006 2:05 AM NosyNed has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by iceage, posted 10-05-2006 1:00 AM ReverendDG has not replied
  
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4141 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 171 of 285 (354695)
10-06-2006 4:40 AM 		Reply to: Message 167 by randman
10-06-2006 4:22 AM

Re: Randman Stop
Well, at least she is not making the horrendous error of claiming microevolution is macroevolution; that natural selection is a driving force for macroevolution; that mutations are random, etc, etc,....and all the non-factual claims evos have made over the years. She at least have SOME EVIDENCE, although much of subjective, of God. That's more than we can say of many of these evo claims, and moreover, evos go as far as to claim that "evolution is observed"; that microevolution is macroevolution is an observed fact. It's astonishing that even a non-scientist can see this is not the case.
randman, not one of these things have ever penitrated your skull, no matter how many topics we start and how many posts we make, you will never agree with anything the evolutionary commuity puts forth as evidence.
you don't care what science shows or you would read what people come up with and try to understand it and stop making up strawmen of what evolution says
and stop with haeckel for gods sake! no one cares! everyone gets it! he messed up get over it!
the fact that you do not grasp why microevolution becomes macroevolution just shows you don't care about learning about it, you just want to say its wrong, because its just wrong to you
how about learning what science means when they say words before you say its wrong for once?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by randman, posted 10-06-2006 4:22 AM randman has not replied
  
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4141 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 273 of 285 (355104)
10-08-2006 12:08 AM 		Reply to: Message 272 by Buzsaw
10-07-2006 10:57 PM

Re: The wrong idea of fairness
Contrary to your claim that there is no creation science, regardless of what you personally think of flood geology, bonafide practicing geologists who research flood geology arriving at alternative interpretations of what is observed are doing science.
i'd like to see this shown someday, all i've seen from the creationist side is faulty research and fudged evidence that turns out to be wrong
This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by Buzsaw, posted 10-07-2006 10:57 PM Buzsaw has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 278 by AdminNosy, posted 10-08-2006 8:43 AM ReverendDG has not replied
 Message 284 by Buzsaw, posted 10-10-2006 7:39 PM ReverendDG has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024