Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 66 of 302 (274465)
12-31-2005 5:12 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by AdminNWR
12-31-2005 5:08 PM


seconding?
If it is ok to second a POTM then it should also be possible to post a disagreement. The discussion should NOT discuss the merits of the content of the post but the quality of the post.
Thus saying that I nominated a post because (in part) it was being "nice" but that, in the opinion of someone else, it was not nice seems to me to be valid here. It is, of course, not easy to avoid arguing the contents of the post as well but I think that was avoided.
Others could argue with NSBF's nomination too if they disagree with my asseseement but NOT just because they disagree with what NSBF had to say (which I do myself, totally).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by AdminNWR, posted 12-31-2005 5:08 PM AdminNWR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Ben!, posted 01-01-2006 12:12 PM NosyNed has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024