vashgun writes:
the few I read disgusted me due to the lack of debate prowess and ignorance presented mainly by the creation minded.
The post I'm replying to is nothing more than an argument of incredulity. You complained about the lack of debating prowess of other creos. You are worse than several creos here.
Where is your evidence that:
radiometric dating assumes too much
geologic column is so hilarious
The idea that life evolved . . .is completely outrageous and unscientific
See, in debates here, we ask for evidence to support one's assertions. Further, as I mentioned previously, you've used the fallacy of an argument of incredulity. (hint: when you claimed evolution is outrageous).
Oh, and please do try to separate biology from geology and both of those from physics. radiometric dating is not evidence for the ToE. Neither is the geologic column.
Funny, you claiming that other creos debated poorly. Or do you think that this post of yours is actually of a higher caliber?