Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Basic and Remedial Fossil Identification
ramoss
Member (Idle past 643 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 95 of 142 (330387)
07-10-2006 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Faith
07-10-2006 1:15 PM


Re: A layman looks at the evidence.
And, why is there not mixing of the various types of "kinds' in the different fossil laysers?
And why does the radiodating show things from different layers consistantly around the world to be of the same date with the same kind, yet a different date with different kinds?
Your explaination does not hold water.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 1:15 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 1:47 PM ramoss has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 643 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 96 of 142 (330392)
07-10-2006 1:36 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by Faith
07-10-2006 1:18 PM


Re: A layman looks at the evidence.
I'll tell you what.
Why don't you get a whole bunch of different sized objects, and a huge vat of mud and water.. and aggitate it around. Then, let the water dry out, and the objects settle where they may.
Let's see if the pattern of object deposits matches what we see in the rocks. Is it one solid layer with the heavier objects tending to be on the bottom of the layer, or is it many layers,where weight of the object is irrelavent?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 1:18 PM Faith has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 643 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 132 of 142 (330630)
07-10-2006 9:28 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by Faith
07-10-2006 1:47 PM


Re: A layman looks at the evidence.
It does?
From a basic physics point of view, show that objects like that would get deposited just like that, in layers no less.
I would like to see an experiment that reproduces the distrubution of objects in layers like that.
I mean, we can see the exact opposite of your claim, because we see how things get deposited on the sea floor today.. year after year, century after century.
You see, your claim 'it makes sense' is just not good enough, because the observations of modern life show that it just doesn't work that way.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 1:47 PM Faith has not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 643 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 136 of 142 (330637)
07-10-2006 9:35 PM
Reply to: Message 112 by Faith
07-10-2006 2:55 PM


Re: A layman looks at the evidence.
except, of course, the spores and pollen fit the age of the rock as dated by the standard model.
There isn't the mixing that would have occured if all this sediment was the result of 'the flood'.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 2:55 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024