la brea tar pits/ humphreys

It is not silly. but I will not open any windows yet but to inform you that I have "drilled" my way up into this part of the site and expect on past performance only better things to come. I am an debted in this post-EvC sense to Humphries for giving me the inside tract on Einstein I had not tried to open before. I approve of the whole truth thus but it will be material where Humphries writes about the "basic principles". I may have longitutde and latitude reversed here because of evolutionary influneces but this would only be possible for me to very in long time or if someone esle finds out this possible error of mine first and continues to bring if that to my attention.

Are you sure or certain that you wish or continue to speak of time differentially in the same formal splits as I or you may with space?

I was not intending to reply on the Pit part of your post, but since "ice age" (show I saw on DVD) your link is thankfully not that!

As you probably know I speak for myself. I do not think that space and time can be simply networked potentially either way as Wolfram lends us the carrot to continue his work off of on, what I meant was that differential time is not something I understand very well but spatial evolution I am willing to postulate so I have no problem with an extra SPACE dimension but if I came across the cosmology and it attempted to explain to me an extra TIME dim then (and this is not so far out as to what Rene Thom whanted communicated in his writings on extending catastrophe models to better approximation to nature and/or science) I would not have likely chosen to post on cosmology and remained with my standards of bashing Provine etc. It seemed to me however that this is what you said but since you phrase in "what GR on a bounded manifold predicts" I may have once again misread your post. I dont know why that happens to me more frequently with yours than others but Inter Alia I mention that Menge may not be Manifold and that I would have first thought only about the gravity waves before a general prediction of GR. I do not have that expertise and since I am finding that I disagree with Einstein on more easily grasped stuff I doubt it will turn to some Borel vs Lebseque difference in terms of GR but it was SR that gave me this confidence. I had a high-school thought on looking at Penrose twistors about g-waves and the Humphreys model gave me a similar feel on the watching the Video. At one place Einstein talks about summing of indexs and I have deviated in the margin at this point for which subjectvity of my own i need a re-read before I weave this into the writing.

Yes, I have not started to discuss CRS articles generally on the web.