Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Creation/Evolution In The News ⇒

Dino "Mummy" (not quite) sheds new light on skin

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dino "Mummy" (not quite) sheds new light on skin
reiverix
Member (Idle past 5848 days)
Posts: 80
From: Central Ohio
Joined: 10-18-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 3 of 17 (438284)
12-03-2007 6:20 PM 		Reply to: Message 1 by jar
12-03-2007 4:32 PM

Preliminary studies are revealing a surprising side to these reptiles, suggesting that Dakota”even though roughly 35 feet (12 meters) long and weighing some 35 tons”was no slowpoke.
Is 35 tons a typo? Seems a bit weighty for a 35ft hadrosaur.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 12-03-2007 4:32 PM jar has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by jar, posted 12-03-2007 6:51 PM reiverix has not replied
 Message 7 by JB1740, posted 12-04-2007 9:56 AM reiverix has not replied
  
reiverix
Member (Idle past 5848 days)
Posts: 80
From: Central Ohio
Joined: 10-18-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 12 of 17 (438382)
12-04-2007 11:14 AM 		Reply to: Message 11 by jar
12-04-2007 11:00 AM

Weight
The reason I brought up the weight issue is because I just happened to be reading up on Sue the T Rex at the time.
​
Sue's Vital Statistics
​
Length: 42 feet (12.8 meters)
Estimated live weight: 7 tons (6.4 metric tons)
This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by jar, posted 12-04-2007 11:00 AM jar has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by jar, posted 12-04-2007 11:24 AM reiverix has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024