Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Anthropogenic Climate Change - What's in Dispute?
JustinC
Member (Idle past 4874 days)
Posts: 624
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Joined: 07-21-2003


Message 5 of 16 (392113)
03-29-2007 11:35 AM


The most plausible (i.e, not completely retarded) response I hear is:
1.) Yes, there is anthropogenic heating of the earth but it is insignificant
and
2.) The real cause of global warming is an increase in insolation due to increased solar activity.
Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years

ABSTRACT:
Direct observations of sunspot numbers are available for the past four centuries, but longer time series are required, for example, for the identification of a possible solar influence on climate and for testing models of the solar dynamo. Here we report a reconstruction of the sunspot number covering the past 11,400 years, based on dendrochronologically dated radiocarbon concentrations. We combine physics-based models for each of the processes connecting the radiocarbon concentration with sunspot number. According to our reconstruction, the level of solar activity during the past 70 years is exceptional, and the previous period of equally high activity occurred more than 8,000 years ago. We find that during the past 11,400 years the Sun spent only of the order of 10% of the time at a similarly high level of magnetic activity and almost all of the earlier high-activity periods were shorter than the present episode. Although the rarity of the current episode of high average sunspot numbers may indicate that the Sun has contributed to the unusual climate change during the twentieth century, we point out that solar variability is unlikely to have been the dominant cause of the strong warming during the past three decades.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/solanki2004/
Though this paper does point out that it is unlikely to be the cause of recent warming.
You are right: it is either increased insolation or increase in greenhouse gas (ignoring geothermal effects). Climatologists and other physical scientists are responsible for running the numbers and seeing which is more likely to be the case, i.e., it's not necessarily obvious. As of now, and likely in the future, the consensus is increased man-made greenhouse gasses.
Unless you are going to appeal to a conspiracy theory or question the scientists integrity, I see no reason to think that their data and calculations are wrong.

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by ThingsChange, posted 04-01-2007 1:36 AM JustinC has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024