Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What Strata does the Biblical Flood Begin & End?
edge
Member (Idle past 1736 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 6 of 30 (21145)
10-30-2002 9:15 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by TrueCreation
10-29-2002 12:10 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
--A somewhat coherent McFall Post, astounding!
--The TrueOrigin article, 'Assessing Creationist Stratigraphy', looks over this question quite well. I would disagree with the way Minnemooseus & Joe Meert (And others?) have deduced from the article. It rather discusses why there is a lack in consensus among creationists in stratigraphic depositions in regards to timing and periods thereof.

'Lack of consensus' is one way of putting it. 'Monumental uninformed confusion' would be probably be more accurate. It seems that since the author cannot find any relationship between any YEC theory and the geological column, he would just as soon ignore the latter. Very convenient!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by TrueCreation, posted 10-29-2002 12:10 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by TrueCreation, posted 10-30-2002 10:25 PM edge has not replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1736 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 15 of 30 (21227)
10-31-2002 10:17 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by TrueCreation
10-31-2002 4:54 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"I fail to see the difficulty. I cannot understand why creationists are unable to predict & test where the flood deposits are. Shouldn't it be glaringly obvious? A global catastrophic flood followed by mainstream deposition/rock formation. Why isn't the line obvious?"
--I don't think the representation should be obvious at all, it doesn't carry the same mechanical operations of deposition as mainstream explanation does.
And that is exactly why the flood should be glaringly obvious in the geological record. It was an event that has no precedent or any modern analog. It was completely different and outside the uniformitarianist philosophy.... Well, at least that is what creationists tell me. So, why does it not leap out of the geological record?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by TrueCreation, posted 10-31-2002 4:54 PM TrueCreation has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Arkansas Banana Boy, posted 06-02-2005 5:30 AM edge has not replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1736 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 23 of 30 (214277)
06-04-2005 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by roxrkool
06-03-2005 10:03 AM


Re: what consensus?
I've heard the Archean-Proterozoic boundary is one possibility for the beginning of the flood. I've also heard the PreC-Cambrian boundary.
The end of the flood appears to be more contentious among the YEC researchers. Some have proposed the beginning of the Cambrian, the Carboniferous, the Permian, the Cretaceous, and the Quaternary.
Basically, they don't have a clue. When they're willing to pin themselves down to a time period, they get in trouble because they can't explain all the details.
Hi, Rox,
Don't forget the recolonization theory. You know, the one where it's all over by the end of the Archean. This one has the incredibly convienient feature that all evidence of previous life and civilizations was comletely destroyed by a massively destructive event in the Archean. Life then began recolonizing the earth in the Proterozoic. This all makes a lot of sense and many find it intellectually satisfying. After all, an event that would metamorphose most of the existing crust would certainly have destroyed any evidence of its passing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by roxrkool, posted 06-03-2005 10:03 AM roxrkool has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by roxrkool, posted 06-05-2005 9:17 PM edge has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024