Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,886 Year: 4,143/9,624 Month: 1,014/974 Week: 341/286 Day: 62/40 Hour: 3/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Against the LAW?
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 46 of 130 (356501)
10-14-2006 3:57 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by jar
10-13-2006 8:54 PM


Re: Mr. Universe.
quote:
And we get the idea Schraf, you have your panties in a wad. Sorry.
Wow, that was a rather bitchy thing to say.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by jar, posted 10-13-2006 8:54 PM jar has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1433 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 47 of 130 (356507)
10-14-2006 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Silent H
10-12-2006 5:01 AM


{SOME} ≠ {ALL}
I'm sorry, but
Yes, the fact that people enjoy pageants, both in watching and participating show that people are not inherently hurt by such programs.
Is patently false logic.
Some people like being bullies, and some people like watching bullies beat up other people, therefore being a bully is okay and does not inherently hurt anyone ....
You are confusing some for all -- that some people like {X} does not mean that nobody is hurt by {X}.
What you are saying really is only that
corrected writes:
Yes, the fact that SOME people enjoy pageants, both in watching and participating show that SOME people are not inherently hurt by such programs.
AND it does NOT show that ALL people are not inherently hurt by such programs.
People who are not in pageants and do not watch them suffer such disorders. Those within them that do suffer such disorders are not forced to do so by those contests.
You missed this point too. I wasn't talking about contestants, but people in the general population with these disorders.
The reason for the disorder is poor self-image along with an irrational belief in what constitutes socially acceptable standards of being good looking. That standard is - in part - enforced by every beauty pagent, with every article about them, with every ad that promotes them, as well as in other ads and promotions of artificial beauty standards: beauty pagents are just the icing on the cake.
And yes, I would expect people with these disorders to try to avoid being bombasted by such exhibitions as much as they could, as it forces them to compare how badly they measure up (in their minds).
The standard is wrong. And yes, SOME people are hurt by it.

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Silent H, posted 10-12-2006 5:01 AM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by nator, posted 10-16-2006 7:43 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1433 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 48 of 130 (356508)
10-14-2006 4:50 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Silent H
10-14-2006 6:18 AM


Re: Mr. Universe.
All that means is it was thought such a show would bring in the most money, or attract the most attention.
Does it really surprise you that in the 50's and 60's where men tended to have the most cash, and their sexuality was not as oppressed as women's, that a show involving a parade of beautiful women (appealing to the most common concepts at that time) would be thought a money-maker?
Yeah, women are just a commodity eh? Shall we have an auction?

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Silent H, posted 10-14-2006 6:18 AM Silent H has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1433 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 49 of 130 (356510)
10-14-2006 5:00 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Silent H
10-14-2006 6:04 AM


hurt is hurt.
I get that they weren't fun for you. I'm not arguing that you or anyone else should like them. What I am challenging is your apparent suggestion of what they are and do.
You were arguing that nobody was hurt by them. That doesn't reflect the reality.
I'm more than likely going to be gone for the next 3-4 days, and so not able to respond anyway. Why not think about the issue and construct a solid argument for your position, which not only explains why you don't like it, but why others do like it, and why beauty is handled in different ways for men and women?
What I don't like:
It's artificial
It's subjective
It's a dual standard on what is valuable about a person.
It's uneccessary
It doesn't contribute anything of value.

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Silent H, posted 10-14-2006 6:04 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Silent H, posted 10-18-2006 8:12 AM RAZD has replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3626 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 50 of 130 (356625)
10-15-2006 7:01 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Chiroptera
10-09-2006 7:21 PM


sex & originality
The beauty pageant really is rather a female counterpart to male athletics. Both events involve sexual display in ritualized forms.
You're not going to stop sexual display. Boys will be boys, and girls will be girls.
That's no reason to like every form displays take. Feeling pressure from the thoughtless 'ideals' created by these things can be a problem, especially for the young. What they need most is help finding ways to be more original.
Some basic natural imperatives behind the rituals, if understood, can find wider and more personally fulfilling applications. One can invent one's own displays once one understands the principles of the basic game. There's no need to follow the crowd. It only takes two playing your game for both of you to win.
Sexual attractiveness depends on the perception of good health, abundant energy, and confidence. A variety of reproductive priorities has made physical beauty a more valued attribute in females and accomplishment a more valued attribute in males. These natural pressures easily become caricatures of themselves through habits of thought and commercial exploitation of the natural interest everyone takes in sex. But smart people don't have to accept everything as a given in so unconscious a fashion. No need to be unsexy, either. Smart people can be original.
Rainer Maria Rilke spoke wisely of the 'burden' carried by each sex. He described a true love relationship as one in which each partner understood the burden born by the other and helped their loved one carry it.
_

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Chiroptera, posted 10-09-2006 7:21 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by nator, posted 10-15-2006 7:45 AM Archer Opteryx has replied
 Message 55 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-15-2006 10:00 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 51 of 130 (356630)
10-15-2006 7:45 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by Archer Opteryx
10-15-2006 7:01 AM


Re: sex & originality
quote:
There's no need to follow the crowd.
But we have a much, much easier time of it socially if we fit in to the crowd.
Attractive people are treated better and get more preferential treatment by everybody. Attractive babies are smiled at and looked after more diligently by their mothers than unattractive babies.
Yes, an individual doesn't have to buy in to what society claims they must look like to be considered attractive, but each individual still has to live and function inside of this society with the "hive mentality".
I can't go anywhere (not even my Yahoo e-mail account) without seeing at least one ad for how I could be thinner, look younger, get rid of cellulite, or reduce lines and wrinkles.
I can tell you as an American woman that it is exhausting to constantly defend against the bombardment that shouts and flashes at me from nearly every quarter.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-15-2006 7:01 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-15-2006 8:44 AM nator has replied
 Message 54 by Damouse, posted 10-15-2006 9:56 PM nator has replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3626 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 52 of 130 (356639)
10-15-2006 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by nator
10-15-2006 7:45 AM


Re: sex & originality
schrafinator:
I can tell you as an American woman that it is exhausting to constantly defend against the bombardment that shouts and flashes at me from nearly every quarter.
Many years ago I read an interview with Dustin Hoffman. He talked about filming Tootsie. The role required him to wear female makeup in many of his scenes. The makeup crew tried out the effect of different versions of the look by taking the actor out to restaurants as he wore it. Hoffman said playing the female role in public made him feel keenly the way women are assessed by their appearance. He said the pressure was constant. And men were not the only people applying it. The cruelest judges, he said, were other women.
Some years after that I read an interview with the mezzo-soprano Frederica Von Stade. Her voice type required her to sing male characters on stage as often as female characters. Her most famous role was the male teenager in Figaro. She said playing that character all her life, together with the experience of becoming a parent herself, made her appreciate the pressures on the young man. No matter what happens to him, she said, he has to be strong and never cry. If he gets hurt he can expect little of the sympathy a girl his age will get. If the army calls him, he must shoulder his musket and march off, no self-pity.
She said she often wanted to compare notes with Dustin Hoffman.
_

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by nator, posted 10-15-2006 7:45 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by nator, posted 10-15-2006 6:23 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 53 of 130 (356737)
10-15-2006 6:23 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Archer Opteryx
10-15-2006 8:44 AM


Re: sex & originality
Ever heard the song When I Was A Boy by Dar Williams?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-15-2006 8:44 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-16-2006 2:19 AM nator has replied

  
Damouse
Member (Idle past 4933 days)
Posts: 215
From: Brookfield, Wisconsin
Joined: 12-18-2005


Message 54 of 130 (356782)
10-15-2006 9:56 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by nator
10-15-2006 7:45 AM


Re: sex & originality
quote:
But we have a much, much easier time of it socially if we fit in to the crowd.
Attractive people are treated better and get more preferential treatment by everybody. Attractive babies are smiled at and looked after more diligently by their mothers than unattractive babies.
Yes, an individual doesn't have to buy in to what society claims they must look like to be considered attractive, but each individual still has to live and function inside of this society with the "hive mentality".
I can't go anywhere (not even my Yahoo e-mail account) without seeing at least one ad for how I could be thinner, look younger, get rid of cellulite, or reduce lines and wrinkles.
I can tell you as an American woman that it is exhausting to constantly defend against the bombardment that shouts and flashes at me from nearly every quarter.
Im severly inclined to disagree. (btw, You cannot list online banner ads as valid proof)
Im sorry, but what is wrong with you?! Hive mentallity?Babies are cared for more if theyre pretty?! your sytem works, but only if the subjects already have that brainwashed mindset. Case in point, YOU. There are multiple mainstream catagories for an adolescant or even an adult; but those labels are applied to the product, not fitted for them.
What shallow dregs of insecurity and weakness are you pulling your ideas from? It exhausts you to ignore something? In america our youth are all taught how to be different; uniqueness is accented.
Edited by Damouse, : No reason given.

-I believe in God, I just call it Nature
-One man with an imaginary friend is insane. a Million men with an imaginary friend is a religion.
-People must often be reminded that the bible did not arrive as a fax from heaven; it was written by men.
-Religion is the opiate of the masses

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by nator, posted 10-15-2006 7:45 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-15-2006 10:10 PM Damouse has replied
 Message 58 by nator, posted 10-15-2006 11:03 PM Damouse has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 130 (356785)
10-15-2006 10:00 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Archer Opteryx
10-15-2006 7:01 AM


Re: sex & originality
The beauty pageant really is rather a female counterpart to male athletics.
Aren't female sports, such as women's golf, volleyball, and basketball the counterpart to male athletics?
Both events involve sexual display in ritualized forms.
What? Something tells me that most men don't watch Moday Night Football for the ritualistic sexual displays. I think you are reading into it too deeply with Darwinian glasses.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-15-2006 7:01 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-16-2006 1:59 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 130 (356789)
10-15-2006 10:10 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Damouse
10-15-2006 9:56 PM


Re: sex & originality
quote:
But we have a much, much easier time of it socially if we fit in to the crowd.
Attractive people are treated better and get more preferential treatment by everybody. Attractive babies are smiled at and looked after more diligently by their mothers than unattractive babies.
Yes, an individual doesn't have to buy in to what society claims they must look like to be considered attractive, but each individual still has to live and function inside of this society with the "hive mentality".
I can't go anywhere (not even my Yahoo e-mail account) without seeing at least one ad for how I could be thinner, look younger, get rid of cellulite, or reduce lines and wrinkles.
I can tell you as an American woman that it is exhausting to constantly defend against the bombardment that shouts and flashes at me from nearly every quarter.
Im severly inclined to disagree. (btw, You cannot list online banner ads as valid proof)
Im sorry, but what is wrong with you?! Hive mentallity?Babies are cared for more if theyre pretty?! your sytem works, but only if the subjects already have that brainwashed mindset. Case in point, YOU. There are multiple mainstream catagories for an adolescant or even an adult; but those labels are applied to the product, not fitted for them.
What shallow dregs of insecurity and weakness are you pulling your ideas from? It exhausts you to ignore something? In america our youth are all taught how to be different; uniqueness is accented.
Schraf and I rarely find ourselves in agreement over anything, but her post here makes valid points, and there is a scientific basis for what she said. She isn't saying that its right, to the contrary, she is merely saying that its the reality and that its a sad mark on a society so imbued with outward appearances.
Attractive people are treated better, right or wrong, it happens. Even babies look upon a symmetrical face longer than one with less symmetry. As for the ads on bueaty, who among us, particularly in America, can deny that we are innundated by images of what society expects of its males and females?
This isn't some pop pyschology that she presenting. Its rooted in reality.

"There is not in all America a more dangerous trait than the deification of mere smartness unaccompanied by any sense of moral responsibility." -Theodore Roosevelt

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Damouse, posted 10-15-2006 9:56 PM Damouse has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Damouse, posted 10-15-2006 10:21 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Damouse
Member (Idle past 4933 days)
Posts: 215
From: Brookfield, Wisconsin
Joined: 12-18-2005


Message 57 of 130 (356791)
10-15-2006 10:21 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by Hyroglyphx
10-15-2006 10:10 PM


Re: sex & originality
quote:
Attractive people are treated better, right or wrong, it happens. Even babies look upon a symmetrical face longer than one with less symmetry. As for the ads on bueaty, who among us, particularly in America, can deny that we are innundated by images of what society expects of its males and females?
I utterly disagree. Again, i believe that you focus to much on topical beauty. Even in school, people are treated on how they act, not how they look. Looks only matter for the first impression, after that, its actions, always. Do you (plural again) treat people differently depending on their looks? A perfect counter example is genetic deformity. A child who is born disfigured will usually get more attention and devotion from their parents, and they are not anything to look at physically.
Why so shallow? Schools dont care. Employers dont care. Government doesnt care. There is no proof that people are indeed treated better by their physical charecteristics.
To leave on a point: can i assume that neither of you have children? Can someone who does have children stop here and drop their two cents as to which child they favor more, if any?
Edited by Damouse, : No reason given.

-I believe in God, I just call it Nature
-One man with an imaginary friend is insane. a Million men with an imaginary friend is a religion.
-People must often be reminded that the bible did not arrive as a fax from heaven; it was written by men.
-Religion is the opiate of the masses

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-15-2006 10:10 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by nator, posted 10-15-2006 11:28 PM Damouse has replied
 Message 60 by Hyroglyphx, posted 10-15-2006 11:44 PM Damouse has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 58 of 130 (356795)
10-15-2006 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Damouse
10-15-2006 9:56 PM


Re: sex & originality
quote:
Im severly inclined to disagree. (btw, You cannot list online banner ads as valid proof)
Why are they not valid proof? I am constantly bombarded with ads aimed at me, a female, trying to sell me stuff that will make me thinner, have less cellulite, have fewer wrinkles, and get me dates.
This is just from my yahoo mail. It doesn't count the innumerable women's magazines prominently displayed at every grocery store checkout line, the commercials on TV, the billboards on highways, the junk snail mail I get every day, etc. There is also the more subtle pressure from the sort of people who are depicted as attractive and desireable on the tv shows, in the movies, in the catalogues, etc.
quote:
Im sorry, but what is wrong with you?! Hive mentallity?
Yes. Human social conditioning. Ingroup/Outgroup.
quote:
Babies are cared for more if theyre pretty?!
Yes, they are.
(Wasn't able to find the original research in a quick search, but will if you need me to. Just ask. In the meanime, here is a second hand source.)
Despite the old adage "never judge a book by its cover" and despite the prevailing belief that attractiveness does not matter once we know a person, even parents judge and treat their own children differently based on attractiveness, although they are not aware of it. In a study of more than 150 Caucasian, Mexican American, and African American newborn infants and mothers, we found that moms of attractive first-born infants were more attentive and affectionate than moms of less attractive first-borns. All the mothers denied that attractiveness should matter in parental treatment of children but their behavior belied their beliefs.
Many studies, in addition, demonstrate that facial attractiveness is a significant correlate of children's popularity in the classroom, where the children are among familiar peers. One study we conducted shows that attractiveness is significantly related to social acceptance and popularity for girls throughout the entire school year. For boys, low attractiveness is associated with rejection by peers. Moreover, the likelihood that unattractive boys would be rejected increased, not decreased, as the school year progressed and as the boys became better acquainted.
quote:
your sytem works, but only if the subjects already have that brainwashed mindset.
As you can see, that is certainly not the case.
quote:
Case in point, YOU. There are multiple mainstream catagories for an adolescant or even an adult; but those labels are applied to the product, not fitted for them.
I don't understand what this means.
quote:
What shallow dregs of insecurity and weakness are you pulling your ideas from?
I'll thank you to refrain from the personal insults in the future.
quote:
It exhausts you to ignore something?
Yes, when it has been in my face as a daily, consistent message for my entire life, it does become exhausting to turn around and ignore it.
quote:
In america our youth are all taught how to be different; uniqueness is accented.
I am sorry, but you are living in a fantasy world if you think that this is what is considered socially acceptable in schools in America.
I I used to work in a town with a large university in it. Every year, a new crop of kids would come in and it was remarkable how similar they all looked. The boys, especially. The uniform was as follows:
Jeans or kakhis, baggy. Polo shirts or t-shirts, also pretty baggy. Baseball caps, turned backwards in the late 90's, but that was out by the 2000's. North Face jackets, always in muted colors. Short hair, but not too short, and mussed up, but not too mussed.
Now, why do you think they all dressed so incredibly similar to each other?
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Damouse, posted 10-15-2006 9:56 PM Damouse has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Damouse, posted 10-16-2006 9:06 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 59 of 130 (356797)
10-15-2006 11:28 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Damouse
10-15-2006 10:21 PM


Re: sex & originality
quote:
There is no proof that people are indeed treated better by their physical charecteristics.
Sure there is.
Attractive people mae more money
Attractive people get better medical treatment
Attractive people inspire trust more readily
Attractive professors tend to receive better evaluations from students
Inmates who became more attractive through cosmetic surgery were less likely to be convicted of a crime after release, even though they were just as likely to commit one
There's more, if you would like to see it. Just let me know.
Edited by schrafinator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Damouse, posted 10-15-2006 10:21 PM Damouse has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Damouse, posted 10-16-2006 8:25 PM nator has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 130 (356798)
10-15-2006 11:44 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by Damouse
10-15-2006 10:21 PM


Re: sex & originality
I utterly disagree. Again, i believe that you focus to much on topical beauty.
How have you deduced this by my post? I'm not agreeing with it from a moral standpoint, I'm simply acknowleging that it exists.
Even in school, people are treated on how they act, not how they look.
What school do you go to? Every school I've ever been to was rooted in a shallow, hollow outlook.
Do you (plural again) treat people differently depending on their looks? A perfect counter example is genetic deformity.
No, I would rfesolve myself to look past mere appearance. But why you are acting like its a mystery is beyond me. Who is more likely to get a job? An obese person or a proportionate person? I'm not asking what you would do, I'm asking how society in general would decide.
A child who is born disfigured will usually get more attention and devotion from their parents, and they are not anything to look at physically.
Well, parental love supersedes looks. But it isn't uncommon that a parent would secretly view their healthy child with a higher praise than their deformed child. Again, I'm not saying that its right, I'm just saying that it happens.
Why so shallow? Schools dont care. Employers dont care. Government doesnt care.
Yes they do. Name me one disfigured president, eminent professor, CEO, or otherwise. If you can produce one I will consider reconsideration.
To leave on a point: can i assume that neither of you have children? Can someone who does have children stop here and drop their two cents as to which child they favor more, if any?
I have two. I'm biased though because I think both my children are bueatiful, emotionally, physically, and mentally.
I tried to upload a picture but I'm not very computer literate. If I figure it out I'll send an image.
Edited by nemesis_juggernaut, : typo
Edited by nemesis_juggernaut, : No reason given.

"There is not in all America a more dangerous trait than the deification of mere smartness unaccompanied by any sense of moral responsibility." -Theodore Roosevelt

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Damouse, posted 10-15-2006 10:21 PM Damouse has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Damouse, posted 10-16-2006 8:44 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024