Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligence Quotients: science or pop pyschology?
anastasia
Member (Idle past 5983 days)
Posts: 1857
From: Bucks County, PA
Joined: 11-05-2006


Message 25 of 25 (386809)
02-23-2007 7:04 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by crashfrog
02-22-2007 12:34 PM


Crashfrog writes:
Obviously you know why this is, but to elucidate for others, IQ score measures your relationship to the scores of the others in your age group. So the trend that you saw was not you getting dumber over time; it was simply a slowing of the rate at which you were getting smarter, like a marathon runner ahead of the pack who begins to slow towards the finish line. The people behind him begin to catch up, but he;s still well out in front.
Any other possibilities or factors? I am curious if the way we think changes over the years, and if education could actually be a stumbling block to basic abilities.
I don't know how to express it scientifically, but I know that sometimes instead of thinking critically, we can start to apply some of the learned 'fundamentals' to a problem, and thus limit the possibility we have of actually reaching an answer that is outside of what we have learned as a formula.
I also think that schraf's stats are lacking; she does not know or say how well the other children in her age-group were doing. It is quite possible that everyone reaches this stage of leveling off. Maybe that was what your post was about?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by crashfrog, posted 02-22-2007 12:34 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024