|
Author
|
Topic: Pre-flood physics?
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
|
Message 10 of 79 (74452)
12-20-2003 4:00 PM
|
Reply to: Message 9 by Buzsaw
12-20-2003 3:52 PM
|
|
Different? How?
Physics of the world changed only 4,500 years ago? How? What changed? How can such a change be concluded from an unsubstantiated change in average or maximum lifespan? ------------------ Common sense isn't
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 9 by Buzsaw, posted 12-20-2003 3:52 PM | | Buzsaw has not replied |
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
|
|
Message 17 of 79 (74550)
12-21-2003 11:08 AM
|
Reply to: Message 14 by edge
12-21-2003 10:32 AM
|
|
Understanding
Question: do you understand what you have just posted?
Obviously not.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 14 by edge, posted 12-21-2003 10:32 AM | | edge has not replied |
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
better start giving your sources
...it is interesting that most of what asteroids consist is believed water, its not unreasonable it explains the asteroid belt This is, of course, utterly wrong. You might do well to start giving source for whereever you are getting your ideas.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 19 by johnfolton, posted 12-21-2003 2:17 PM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
more nonsense
..it appears they have not even dated the magnetic reversals layers for age, just assuming the lavas are spreading over millions of years, likely if ever they date the basalt magnetic basalts, the age will be the same, all across the oceans bottom, meaning of course the techtonic plates are not spreading via basalts, etc This is also completely wrong. Why don't you try a bit of googling and read a little? You are as full of wrong ideas as anyone who has ever dropped by here. And, believe me, that is saying something!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 20 by johnfolton, posted 12-21-2003 2:28 PM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
Enough Nonsense
I think you've had your go at this. Neither Noah's ark nor any other evidence has been found and substantiated. You seem to be able to believe just about any nonsense. Why don't you just hang off posting a bit and read over some threads to get an idea of how to debate. You do need to both organize your thoughts more and then offer some substantiation other than single paragraphs rambles based on nothing much but fairy tales. ------------------ Common sense isn't
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 23 by johnfolton, posted 12-21-2003 3:24 PM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
A bad tummy ache
What you write is indigestable.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 25 by johnfolton, posted 12-21-2003 4:10 PM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
Responding to points raised
Whatever, have you yet responded to what anyone has said to you? If you can't do that then you may as well stop posting as very soon now you will start to be ignored. If you have responded then I'm sorry for having missed it and would be interested in having you point it out.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 42 by johnfolton, posted 12-22-2003 4:08 PM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
Source of this profound insight
if it was a star for 4.6 billion years, the sun would have thickened up in the core, as light is given off, 4.6 billion years is a mighty long period of time, and the core harmonics suggests the sun is young, not old. "thickened"? Could you tell us where you got this idea? Could you describe the physics of a thick sun? Is it like a pudding? Please give a source for your core harmonics comment. Since you have already demonstrated that you have no idea what you are talking about I presume you are taking this from someone who you think does know.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 65 by johnfolton, posted 12-24-2003 10:44 PM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
Comments?
Uh, Thanks? Do you have any more comment than that?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 72 by johnfolton, posted 12-25-2003 1:09 PM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
NosyNed
Member Posts: 9004 From: Canada Joined: 04-04-2003
|
The old science that the original statements of AIG were based on is superceded. It is old! It is not available to you as an excuse any more. It is gone! You are wrong! Done with. And if all that isn't enough what about 100's of other lines of evidence that you have to deal with? If you're a young earther then please drop in on some of the date and dating threads. Good luck! 
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 74 by johnfolton, posted 12-25-2003 2:29 PM | | johnfolton has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2