|
Understanding through Discussion |
|
|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
| EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
|
| |
| ChatGPT | |
| Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2 |
| Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
| Author | Topic: Lake Varve Sediments and the Great Flood | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days)  Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
The data in the image above are radiocarbon dates for layers in several different phenomena. As you can see, they all match almost perfectly. The data includes very different phenomena, such as tree rings, lake varves, and mineral deposits in a cave. Source please - this includes IntCal04 (Reimer) data... we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
In the meantime, please explain the concordance of varve counts with radiocarbon data from Lake Suigetsu. Especially the correlation with varve count, depth of sediment and 14C age. From Message 259 of Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III) ... which is also not answered by creationist.
See Message 249 Doing the same thing on that graph of varve and 14C dating versus sediment depth from Lake Suigetsu:
A 40,000-YEAR VARVE CHRONOLOGY FROM LAKE SUIGETSU, JAPAN: EXTENSION OF THE 14C CALIBRATION CURVE quote: Notice the correlation with age and depth and with the rate of deposit of the sediments, especially where it changes. The only issue with Lake Suigetsu I see is when they get beyond the level of the diatom layers, at about 37,930 years BP (before 1950, or 35,980 BCE). And 37,930 BP is where the solid line becomes dashed. The age gets an offset (due to different atmospheric levels of 14C) but the pattern of deposition of the samples and the varves still match for different rates of deposit of sediment in the varves. Explain that correlation while your mixing your magic mud samples. AND put this little wrinkle into the equations, the 14C age is calculated based on the exponential decay curve: How Carbon-14 Dating Works | HowStuffWorkswhere t is the "C-14 age", ln is the natural logarithm, Nf/No is the percent of carbon-14 in the sample compared to the amount in living tissue, and t1/2 is the half-life of carbon-14. or t = -8267 x ln (Nf/No) Where No is the original level of the C-14 isotope in the sample (when it was alive and growing and absorbing atmospheric C-14), and Nf is the amount remaining. The value for No today is ~0.00000000010% of total organic carbon and Nf is smaller depending on how much time has passed. This means you need this kind of shape for the 14C raw data compared to the varve raw data:
Enjoy. Edited by RAZD, : curve information Edited by RAZD, : -(2) we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RAZD Member (Idle past 1435 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
especially when you look at the curve of the 14C raw data that has to make this magic turn.
 we are limited in our ability to understand by our ability to understand RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024
