Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   An Inconvenient Truth
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 11 of 109 (347933)
09-10-2006 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Quetzal
09-10-2006 11:47 AM


Re: what, again?
Gore has played the hyper-environmental game at least one too many times.
What has bothered me, is that the Clinton/Gore administration did so little during their 8 years in office.
Now that Gore is no longer running for political office, apparently he can now come out and say what he should have said long ago. In short, Gore has demonstrated the kind of integrity we have come to expect from politicians.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Quetzal, posted 09-10-2006 11:47 AM Quetzal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by crashfrog, posted 09-10-2006 2:09 PM nwr has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 17 of 109 (347965)
09-10-2006 4:27 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by crashfrog
09-10-2006 2:09 PM


Re: Somewhat off toic discussion of Clinton admin actions.
Did so little? What do you mean?
Am I supposed to catalog all that was not done?
Clinton/Gore managed to postpone action on the most politically sensitive issues until after they were out of office.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by crashfrog, posted 09-10-2006 2:09 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by crashfrog, posted 09-10-2006 6:09 PM nwr has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 22 of 109 (347986)
09-10-2006 6:58 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by crashfrog
09-10-2006 6:09 PM


Re: Somewhat off toic discussion of Clinton admin actions.
I guess I'd like you to explain how the administration I remember as the most evironmentally-conscious one in my lifetime somehow represents the one that did "so little."
I am not denying that they were environmentally friendly. I am saying that they did little to specifically address the problem of global warming.
What legislation did Clinton veto? What specific policies were reccommended but ignored?
That's where I found them disappointing. There were no bold initiatives, no strong recommendations.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by crashfrog, posted 09-10-2006 6:09 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by crashfrog, posted 09-10-2006 7:31 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024